Literature DB >> 20046958

Sequence Encoders Enable Large-Scale Lexical Modeling: Reply to Bowers and Davis (2009).

Daragh E Sibley1, Christopher T Kello, David C Plaut, Jeffrey L Elman.   

Abstract

Sibley, Kello, Plaut, and Elman (2008) proposed the sequence encoder as a model that learns fixed-width distributed representations of variable-length sequences. In doing so, the sequence encoder overcomes problems that have restricted models of word reading and recognition to processing only monosyllabic words. Bowers and Davis (in press) recently claimed that the sequence encoder does not actually overcome the relevant problems, and hence is not a useful component of large-scale word reading models. In this reply, it is noted that the sequence encoder has facilitated the creation of large-scale word reading models. The reasons for this success are explained, and stand as counterarguments to claims made by Bowers and Davis.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046958      PMCID: PMC2746651          DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01064.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  8 in total

Review 1.  The neural code for written words: a proposal.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen; Mariano Sigman; Fabien Vinckier
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Jean-Pierre Granier; Fernand Farioli; Eva Van Assche; Walter J B van Heuven
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Binder; David A Medler; Chris F Westbury; Einat Liebenthal; Lori Buchanan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud.

Authors:  Conrad Perry; Johannes C Ziegler; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Large-Scale Modeling of Wordform Learning and Representation.

Authors:  Daragh E Sibley; Christopher T Kello; David C Plaut; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-06-01

6.  A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading.

Authors:  B Ans; S Carbonnel; S Valdois
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Learning representations of wordforms with recurrent networks: comment on sibley, kello, plaut, & elman (2008).

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bowers; Colin J Davis
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-09

8.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.

Authors:  D C Plaut; J L McClelland; M S Seidenberg; K Patterson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.934

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.