Literature DB >> 20046759

High performance thin layer chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of Ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride.

S S Chitlange1, D M Sakarkar, S B Wankhede, S G Wadodkar.   

Abstract

High performance thin layer chromatographic method is developed for simultaneous estimation of ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride in tablets. Silica gel 60F(254) plates were used as stationary phase and t.butanol: ethyl acetate: glacial acetic acid: water (7:4:2:2 v/v) as mobile phase. Wavelength selected for analysis was 254 nm. Percent estimation of ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine hydrochloride was found to be 99.56% and 98.77%, respectively. Percent recovery for both the drugs was found in the range of 98.27% to 100.91%, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPTLC; Ibuprofen; ethyl acetate; glacial acetic acid; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride; t-butanol; water

Year:  2008        PMID: 20046759      PMCID: PMC2792507          DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.43018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0250-474X            Impact factor:   0.975


Ibuprofen (IBU) is a non steroidal antiinflammatory agent with propionic acid group. Chemically it is (RS)-2-(4-isobutyl phenyl) propionic acid. Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride (PEH) is a sympathomimetic agent. Chemically it is (1S,2S)-2-methyl amino-1-phenyl-1-propanol hydrochloride. Fixed dose combination tablet containing IBU (200 mg) and PEH (30 mg) is available for clinical use. IBU is official in IP, BP and USP. PEH is official in IP, BP, EP and USP. Literature survey revealed spectrophotometric1, spectrofluorometric2, HPLC3–4, GC5 and HPTLC6 methods for estimation of IBU alone or in combination with other drugs, in pharmaceutical formulation and biological fluids. PEH is reported to be estimated by non-aqueous titrimetry7, derivative spectrophotometry8, HPLC910, capillary electrophoresis1112 individually or in combination with other drugs, in pharmaceutical formulation and biological fluids. Spectrophotometric1314 methods are reported for simultaneous estimation of these drugs in tablet formulation. In the present work a successful attempt has been made to estimate both these drugs simultaneously by economical and less time consuming HPTLC method. A Camag-HPTLC system comprising of Linomat-IV automatic sample applicator and Camag TLC scanner 3 with CAT’S version 4.0 software were used for sample application and quantitative evaluation respectively. Samples were applied as bands (band size: 6 mm at 6 mm interval) under a stream of nitrogen on aluminium plates coated with silica gel 60F254 (10×10 cm, Merck) and chromatographed using tertiary butanol:ethyl acetate:glacial acetic acid: water (7:4:2:2 v/v) as mobile phase. Ascending development was performed in a saturated twin-trough TLC chamber. Chromatogram was evaluated by scanning in absorbance/reflectance mode at 254 nm using slit dimensions 4×0.45 mm and quantitation was done by comparing peak height of standard and sample peaks. Standard solution containing 8 mg/ml of IBU and 1.2 mg/ml of PEH was prepared in methanol. To study the linearity of detector response, the standard stock solutions were appropriately diluted and accurately measured volume ranging from 1 to 10 μl was applied on the TLC plate. The plate was then chromatographed in the selected chromatographic conditions. A calibration graph was constructed by plotting peak height versus concentration. For estimation of IBU and PEH in tablets, an accurately weighed quantity of tablet powder equivalent to 200 mg of IBU was transferred to 25 ml volumetric flask, shaken with 10 ml of methanol for 15 min. and the volume was then adjusted to the mark with methanol. The solution was then filtered through whatman Grade I filter paper and 6 μl of the filtrate (six bands) and standard solution (one band) was applied on the TLC plate and chromatographed. Amount of both the drugs were estimated by comparing the peak height of standard and sample bands. The results are shown in Table 1 and respective densitogram is shown in fig. 1.
TABLE 1

RESULTS OF ESTIMATION IN TABLET AND RECOVERY STUDIES

SampleLabel claim (mg/tablet)% Label claim*, SD, CV% Recovery*, SD, CV


IBUPEHIBUPEH
Standard laboratory mixture-99.01±0.88999.46±0.731--
0.0300.024
Arinac tabletIBU 20099.56±1.66898.77±1.452100.69±1.662101.03±1.854
PEH - 300.0160.0240.0160.018

Indicates mean of five observations, ± indicates standard deviation. IBU stands for ibuprofen and PEH denotes pseudoephedrine hydrochloride.

Fig. 1

Chromatogram of marketed formulation.

1- pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and 2- ibuprofen

RESULTS OF ESTIMATION IN TABLET AND RECOVERY STUDIES Indicates mean of five observations, ± indicates standard deviation. IBU stands for ibuprofen and PEH denotes pseudoephedrine hydrochloride. Chromatogram of marketed formulation. 1- pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and 2- ibuprofen To study the accuracy of the proposed method recovery studies were carried out using standard addition method. The percent recovery was calculated by using the formula, % recovery= (T-A)/S×100, where T is total amount of drug estimated, A is the amount of drug contributed by tablet powder and S is the amount of pure drug added. Result of recovery studies are shown in Table 1. The system repeatability was studied by applying five replicate applications of standard solution on TLC plate. The plate was chromatographed and the standard deviation for peak height of IBU and PEH was calculated. The robustness of the method was evaluated by studying analyst-to-analyst, intra and inter day variations. The selected chromatographic conditions were found to effectively separate IBU (Rf = 0.91) and PEH (Rf = 0.68). The linearity for detector response was observed in the range of 45.6-75.6 μg for IBU (correlation coefficient = 0.9934) and 6.8-11.3 μg for PEH (correlation coefficient = 0.9963). Percent amount of IBU and PEH estimated in the average weight of tablet were found to be 99.56% (standard deviation = ±0.1.668) and 98.77% (standard deviation = ±1.452), respectively. The low values of standard deviation indicate the precision of the method. Percent recovery for IBU and PEH was found to be 100.69% (standard deviation = ±1.662) and 101.03% (standard deviation = ±1.854) indicating that the excipients does not have interference in their estimation. The system repeatability studied by five replicate applications of standard solution. The standard deviations for peak height were found to be ±0.11 for IBU and ±0.06 for PEH. The standard deviation for robustness studies was below 2%. Based on the above results it can be concluded that the proposed HPTLC method is accurate, precise, specific and reproducible. The method is also economical and less time consuming and can be used for routine analysis of ibuprofen and Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride.
  11 in total

1.  Second-derivative spectrophotometric assay of pseudoephedrine, ibuprofen and loratadine in pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  D Ivanovic; M Medenica; S Markovic; G Mandic
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  2000-11

2.  Spectrofluorometric determination of ibuprofen in pharmaceutical formulations.

Authors:  P C Damiani; M Bearzotti; M A Cabezón
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.935

3.  Separation and determination of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine by combination of flow injection with capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Hongli Chen; Xingguo Chen; Qiaosheng Pu; Zhide Hu; Zhengfeng Zhao; Martin Hooper
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.618

4.  Validation of a liquid chromatographic method for the determination of ibuprofen in human plasma.

Authors:  Henry Farrar; Lynda Letzig; Michael Gill
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2002-11-25       Impact factor: 3.205

5.  Determination of ibuprofen in dog plasma by liquid chromatography and application in pharmacokinetic studies of an ibuprofen prodrug in dogs.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Meiling Qi; Lihe Liu; Lin Fang
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 3.935

6.  Separation and determination of pseudoephedrine, dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine and chlorpheniramine in cold medicines by nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Yuming Dong; Xiaofeng Chen; Yonglei Chen; Xingguo Chen; Zhide Hu
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  High-performance thin-layer chromatographic determination of ibuprofen in plasma.

Authors:  T K Save; D V Parmar; P V Devarajan
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  1997-03-07

8.  Spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Ibuprofen in tablets.

Authors:  Abdel Aziz Wahbi; Ekram Hassan; Dalia Hamdy; Essam Khamis; Magda Barary
Journal:  Pak J Pharm Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.684

9.  Optical purity determination of (S)-ibuprofen in tablets by achiral gas chromatography.

Authors:  Man-Jeong Paik; Kyoung-Rae Kim
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.946

10.  Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and ibuprofen in a pharmaceutical preparation using ratio spectra derivative spectrophotometry and multivariate calibration techniques.

Authors:  I Murat Palabiyik; Erdal Dinç; Feyyaz Onur
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 3.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.