| Literature DB >> 20046734 |
Tabassum Khan1, Pratima Tatke, S Y Gabhe.
Abstract
The aqueous extract of the aerial roots the Indian Banyan, Ficus benghalensis L. (Family: Moraceae) was evaluated for its effect on both specific and non-specific immunity. This extract exhibited a significant increase in percentage phagocytosis by human neutrophils in the in vitro tests. It exhibited promising immunostimulant activity at doses of 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg body weight in SRBC induced hypersensitivity reaction and hemagglutination reaction in rats. The aqueous extract was found to stimulate the cell mediated and antibody mediated immune responses.Entities:
Keywords: Ficus benghalensis; hemagglutination reaction; hypersensitivity reaction; immunostimulant
Year: 2008 PMID: 20046734 PMCID: PMC2792505 DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.42970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharm Sci ISSN: 0250-474X Impact factor: 0.975
Fig. 1Demonstration of hemagglutination using antibodies against sheep red blood cells
The 96 well microplate shows the serum dilution and calculation of antibody titer in the hemagglutination assay.
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL EVALUATION OF THE AQUEOUS EXTRACT
| Physicochemical properties | Aqueous extract |
|---|---|
| Nature | |
| Semisolid | |
| Colour | |
| Dark brown | |
| pH | |
| 10.0 | |
| Extractive value %w/w | |
| 24.37% | |
| Alcohol soluble extractive of the root powder %w/w | 8% |
| Water soluble extractive of the root powder %w/w | 25% |
The results are an average of three estimates
IN VITRO PHAGOCYTOSIS TEST OF THE AQUEOUS EXTRACT
| Test extract | Concentration (mg/ml) | % Phagocytosis | Phagocytic index | % Immunostimulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous extract | Control | 34±1.11 | 1.60±0.04 | |
| 0.5 | 55±2.80 | 1.93±0.06 | 21.05±6.22 | |
| 1.0 | 64±1.45 | 2.01±0.03 | 25.35±2.03 | |
| 2.0 | 54±1.78 | 1.86±0.05 | 16.04±4.38 |
The results are an average of six estimates. The values are expressed as mean±SEM; Significance levels
P<0.05 (Dunnets‘t’ test) versus the vehicle control.
HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTION OF THE AQUEOUS EXTRACT
| Aqueous extract (Oral dose in mg/kg) | Inflammation after challenge Difference in rat paw thickness before and after giving the antigen in mm | |
|---|---|---|
| 4 h | 24 h | |
| Control | 0.45±0.02 | 0.03±0.13 |
| 50 | 0.88±0.12 | 0.51±0.17 |
| 100 | 1.48±0.19 | 0.76±0.16 |
| 200 | 1.03±0.16 | 0.79±0.15 |
| 400 | 1.28±0.15 | 0.14±0.18 |
The results are an average of six animals. The values are expressed as mean±SEM; Significance levels
P<0.05, (Dunnets‘t’ test) versus the vehicle control.
HEMAGGLUTINATION REACTION OF THE AQUEOUS EXTRACT
| Aqueous extract (Oral dose in mg/kg) | Hemagglutination antibody titer | |
|---|---|---|
| Range | Mean Antibody titer | |
| Control | 128 - 256 | 205±14.02 |
| 50 | 512 - 2048 | 1126±112.17 |
| 100 | 2048 - 4096 | 2458±183.17 |
| 200 | 1024 - 2048 | 1638±112.17 |
| 400 | 1024 - 2048 | 1638±112.17 |
The results are an average of six animals. The values are expressed as mean±SEM Significance levels
P<0.05, (Dunnets‘t’ test) versus the vehicle control.