Literature DB >> 20046619

The Reliability of Maitland's Irritability Judgments in Patients with Low Back Pain.

Edward T Barakatt, Patrick S Romano, Daniel L Riddle, Laurel A Beckett.   

Abstract

Maitland's construct of musculoskeletal pain irritability is widely used by physical therapists but has not been defined to the extent that its measurement properties can be tested. The purpose of this study was to examine the inter-rater reliability of physical therapists' irritability judgments during application to patients with low back pain (LBP). Eighty patients with LBP received two consecutive examinations at their initial clinic visit by two physical therapists. Patients reported pain location and intensity prior to each evaluation. Therapists judged subjects' LBP as irritable or non-irritable. Inter-rater agreement of physical therapist irritability judgments was moderate (kappa = 0.44, prevalence-adjusted kappa = 0.50). This level of reliability of therapists' LBP irritability judgments may be improved upon by development of an operational definition of pain irritability. Further research is needed to identify measures appropriate for inclusion in an operational definition of pain irritability and to assess the value of making pain irritability judgments in evidence-based physical therapy practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation; Irritability; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Spine; Maitland

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046619      PMCID: PMC2762835          DOI: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  22 in total

1.  Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  F K Hoehler
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective.

Authors:  J M Fritz; R S Wainner
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-09

Review 3.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

4.  [The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercise therapy or ordinary activity?].

Authors:  A Malmivaara; T Aro
Journal:  Duodecim       Date:  1995

5.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences.

Authors:  J K Moffett; D Torgerson; S Bell-Syer; D Jackson; H Llewlyn-Phillips; A Farrin; J Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

7.  The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability.

Authors:  M Kankaanpää; S Taimela; O Airaksinen; O Hänninen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain.

Authors:  G Waddell; G Feder; M Lewis
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Conservative treatment of acute low-back pain. A prospective randomized trial: McKenzie method of treatment versus patient education in "mini back school".

Authors:  R Stankovic; O Johnell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Mark Laslett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008
View more
  7 in total

1.  An Exploration of Maitland's Concept of Pain Irritability in Patients with Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Edward T Barakatt; Patrick S Romano; Daniel L Riddle; Laurel A Beckett; Richard Kravitz
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

2.  Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients.

Authors:  Julie Schwind; Kenneth Learman; Bryan O'Halloran; Christopher Showalter; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

3.  SYMPTOM INSTABILITY AND A PROPOSED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE PHYSICAL THERAPY MANAGEMENT OF SPORTS-RELATED CONCUSSION.

Authors:  Mark Lundblad
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-09

4.  Severity, Irritability, Nature, Stage, and Stability (SINSS): A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Evan J Petersen; Stephanie M Thurmond; Gail M Jensen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-05-17

5.  In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small - a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Hanne Rasmussen; Peter Kent; Per Kjaer; Alice Kongsted
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Prognostic implications of the Quebec Task Force classification of back-related leg pain: an analysis of longitudinal routine clinical data.

Authors:  Alice Kongsted; Peter Kent; Tue Secher Jensen; Hanne Albert; Claus Manniche
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Patients with low back pain differ from those who also have leg pain or signs of nerve root involvement - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alice Kongsted; Peter Kent; Hanne Albert; Tue Secher Jensen; Claus Manniche
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.