Literature DB >> 20046575

New challenges to medicare beneficiary access to mAbs.

Joshua Cohen1, Andrew Wilson.   

Abstract

Precision binding of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to biological targets, their relative clinical success, and expansion of indications following initial approval, are distinctive clinical features. The relatively high cost of mAbs, together with the absence of a regulatory pathway to generics, stand out as distinctive economic features. Based on both literature review and primary data collection we enumerated mAb original approvals, supplemental indications and off-label uses, assessed payer formulary management of mAbs, and determined new challenges to Medicare beneficiary access to mAbs. We found that the FDA has approved 22 mAbs and 30 supplemental indications pertaining to the originally approved mAbs. In addition, there are 46 off-label use citations in officially recognized pharmaceutical compendia. Across Part B carriers and Part D plans, we found considerable variation in terms of coverage and conditions of reimbursement related to on- and off-label uses of mAbs. Our results point to four major challenges facing mAb developers, health care providers, Medicare beneficiaries, payers and policymakers. These include administrative price controls, coverage variation, projected shift from physician- to self-administered mAbs, and comparative effectiveness. We suggest more systematic use of "coverage with evidence development" as a means of optimally addressing these challenges.

Keywords:  comparative effectiveness; formulary management; mAbs; medicare; off-label; reimbursement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046575      PMCID: PMC2715185          DOI: 10.4161/mabs.1.1.7246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAbs        ISSN: 1942-0862            Impact factor:   5.857


  18 in total

1.  Benefit design and specialty drug use.

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; Geoffrey F Joyce; Grant Lawless; William H Crown; Vincent Willey
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Biotechnology and Medicare's new technology policy: lessons from three case studies.

Authors:  Patricia Seliger Keenan; Peter J Neumann; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Promoting medical innovation while developing sound social and business policy: a conversation with Thomas G. Roberts. Interview by Barbara J. Culliton.

Authors:  Thomas G Roberts
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Medicare program: changes to the hospital outpatient prospective payment system and CY 2008 payment rates, the ambulatory surgical center payment system and CY 2008 payment rates, the hospital inpatient prospective payment system and FY 2008 payment rates; and payments for graduate medical education for affiliated teaching hospitals in certain emergency situations Medicare and Medicaid programs: hospital conditions of participation; necessary provider designations of critical access hospitals. Interim and final rule with comment period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2007-11-27

5.  Coverage with evidence development: an examination of conceptual and policy issues.

Authors:  John Hutton; Paul Trueman; Christopher Henshall
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  Development trends for new cancer therapeutics and vaccines.

Authors:  Janice M Reichert; Julia B Wenger
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  What's fueling the biotech engine?

Authors:  Saurabh Aggarwal
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  Development trends for monoclonal antibody cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Janice M Reichert; Viia E Valge-Archer
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathy Miller; Molin Wang; Julie Gralow; Maura Dickler; Melody Cobleigh; Edith A Perez; Tamara Shenkier; David Cella; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Trends in the development and approval of monoclonal antibodies for viral infections.

Authors:  Janice M Reichert
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.807

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Strategies and challenges for the next generation of therapeutic antibodies.

Authors:  Alain Beck; Thierry Wurch; Christian Bailly; Nathalie Corvaia
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  What is the value of oncology medicines?

Authors:  Joshua Cohen; William Looney
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Metrics for antibody therapeutics development.

Authors:  Janice M Reichert
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.857

4.  Antibodies to watch in 2010.

Authors:  Janice M Reichert
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  5th Annual Monoclonal Antibodies Conference: March 24-25, 2009, London, UK.

Authors:  Mari Herigstad; Lisa Urquhart
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.857

6.  Bispecific antibodies targeting tumor-associated antigens and neutralizing complement regulators increase the efficacy of antibody-based immunotherapy in mice.

Authors:  P Macor; E Secco; N Mezzaroba; S Zorzet; P Durigutto; T Gaiotto; L De Maso; S Biffi; C Garrovo; S Capolla; C Tripodo; V Gattei; R Marzari; F Tedesco; D Sblattero
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Why could passive Immunoglobulin E antibody therapy be safe in clinical oncology?

Authors:  E Jensen-Jarolim; J Singer
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 5.018

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.