Literature DB >> 20046561

Clinical perspective: how do clinical test results differentiate chronic and subacute low back pain patients from "non-patients"?

Markku Paatelma, Eira Karvonen, Jouko Heiskanen.   

Abstract

Our limited understanding of underlying conditions for back pain is reflected in the common use of pain-duration-based groupings. The aim of this paper was to investigate typical clinical tests used in examining low back pain (LBP) patients in order to discover how tests distinguish between chronic low back pain patients (CLBP) and subacute low back pain patients (SLBP) and if they distinguish these groups from those with no "patient status." CLBP patients in this study were from a university hospital and SLBP patients were from five occupational health care centers. Control subjects were recruited from a university. Determination of the best predictors between CLBP and SLBP patients and between CLBP and SLBP patients and non-patients was made by a forward stepwise logistic model. A total of 157 subjects were included in the study. Of all the clinical tests, several tests in each category had high odds ratio, differentiating CLBP patients from controls. Only a few tests differentiated between CLBP and SLBP patients. The only clinical differences between SLBP patients and controls were in the mobility test and in one test of muscle tightness. The best predictor for CLBP was the lumbar spine flexion test. SLBP patients seemed to differ from the control group in lumbar flexion, in a specific anterior-posterior mobility test, and in tightness of hip flexor muscles. CLBP patients differed from SLBP patients in functional tests, in the presence of sensation in the feet, and in different pain provocation tests. Whether these tests are sufficiently sensitive to classify a more specific diagnostic or clinical subgroup remains untested, and further studies with clinical tests to differentiate among pathological conditions are necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Tests; Low Back Pain; Odds Ratios; Orthopedic Manipulative Therapy; Sensitivity; Specificity

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046561      PMCID: PMC2704343          DOI: 10.1179/106698109790818197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  17 in total

1.  Changes in alpha-motoneuron excitability with positions that tension neural tissue.

Authors:  J M Kerr; A L Vujnovich; L Bradnam
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12

2.  The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Andreas Klipstein; Susanne Spillmann; Jesper Strøyer; Thomas Laubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Pain-related factors contributing to muscle inhibition in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental investigation based on superimposed electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Jeanine A Verbunt; Henk A Seelen; Johan W Vlaeyen; Eric J Bousema; Geert J van der Heijden; Peter H Heuts; J Andre Knottnerus
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 5.  Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions.

Authors:  M W van Tulder; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; T Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain.

Authors:  J A Hides; C A Richardson; G A Jull
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability.

Authors:  Gregory E Hicks; Julie M Fritz; Anthony Delitto; John Mishock
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft; Alf L Nachemson; Rachelle Buchbinder; Bruce F Walker; Mary Wyatt; J David Cassidy; Michel Rossignol; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Jan Hartvigsen; Päivi Leino-Arjas; Ute Latza; Shmuel Reis; Maria Teresa Gil Del Real; Francisco M Kovacs; Birgitta Oberg; Christine Cedraschi; Lex M Bouter; Bart W Koes; H Susan J Picavet; Maurits W van Tulder; Kim Burton; Nadine E Foster; Gary J Macfarlane; Elaine Thomas; Martin Underwood; Gordon Waddell; Paul Shekelle; Ernest Volinn; Michael Von Korff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Relationship between mechanical factors and incidence of low back pain.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Nourbakhsh; Amir Massoud Arab
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pain characteristic differences between subacute and chronic back pain.

Authors:  Mona Lisa Chanda; Matthew D Alvin; Thomas J Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Knowledge translation from continuing education to physiotherapy practice in classifying patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Eira Karvonen; Markku Paatelma; Jukka-Pekka Kesonen; Ari O Heinonen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-05

3.  Inter-tester Reliability in Classifying Acute and Subacute Low Back Pain Patients into Clinical Subgroups: A Comparison of Specialists and Non-Specialists. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Markku Paatelma; Eira Karvqnen; Ari Heinqnen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

4.  Passive hip range of motion is reduced in active subjects with chronic low back pain compared to controls.

Authors:  Sean M Roach; Jun G San Juan; Dave N Suprak; Marc Lyda; Alexander J Bies; Cooper R Boydston
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-02

5.  Hand reach star excursion balance test: An alternative test for dynamic postural control and functional mobility.

Authors:  Ola Eriksrud; Peter Federolf; Patrick Anderson; Jan Cabri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Biofeedback Physical Therapy With the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) Lumbar Type for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yasunaga; Ren Koizumi; Taro Toyoda; Masao Koda; Naotaka Mamizuka; Yoshiyuki Sankai; Masashi Yamazaki; Kousei Miura
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.