PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS) and assess its potential for monitoring progression. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic tests in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: For reproducibility, we included 43 ocular hypertensive (OHT) and 31 glaucoma subjects. For progression, we included 198 OHT and 21 control subjects. METHODS: To study reproducibility, global GPS values were generated for HRT images acquired in a test-retest study. Images were acquired at 2 visits within 6 weeks of each other, by 2 different observers. To study progression, GPS values were generated for HRT images acquired prospectively (1993-2001). Linear regression of GPS against time was performed, with progression defined as a significant negative slope (P<0.05). Criterion specificity was estimated from the number of improving subjects (significant positive slope) and the number of progressing controls. Visual field (VF) progression in the same subjects was assessed using 3-omitting pointwise linear regression of sensitivity over time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reproducibility of GPS was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference, 95% limits of agreement). Progression was assessed by the number of OHT subjects identified as progressing, and by agreement with VF progression. RESULTS:Reproducibility of GPS was better at its extremes (-0.01+/-0.20 for GPS 0-0.30, and 0.02+/-0.09 for GPS 0.78-1.00) than in its mid range (0.07+/-0.54 for GPS 0.30-0.78). Estimated criterion specificity ranged from 95.2% (95% confidence interval, 76.1%-99.9%) to 96.8% (93.2%-98.5%). Twenty-five OHT subjects (12.6%) progressed by GPS, with 11 of the 25 (5.6%) also progressing by VF; 26 subjects (13.1%) progressed by VF alone. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in HRT GPS values between 0.30 and 0.78 should be interpreted with caution because the index has poorer reproducibility in this range. The global GPS progression algorithm performs at least as well as previously described rim area-based HRT progression strategies. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS) and assess its potential for monitoring progression. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic tests in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: For reproducibility, we included 43 ocular hypertensive (OHT) and 31 glaucoma subjects. For progression, we included 198 OHT and 21 control subjects. METHODS: To study reproducibility, global GPS values were generated for HRT images acquired in a test-retest study. Images were acquired at 2 visits within 6 weeks of each other, by 2 different observers. To study progression, GPS values were generated for HRT images acquired prospectively (1993-2001). Linear regression of GPS against time was performed, with progression defined as a significant negative slope (P<0.05). Criterion specificity was estimated from the number of improving subjects (significant positive slope) and the number of progressing controls. Visual field (VF) progression in the same subjects was assessed using 3-omitting pointwise linear regression of sensitivity over time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reproducibility of GPS was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference, 95% limits of agreement). Progression was assessed by the number of OHT subjects identified as progressing, and by agreement with VF progression. RESULTS: Reproducibility of GPS was better at its extremes (-0.01+/-0.20 for GPS 0-0.30, and 0.02+/-0.09 for GPS 0.78-1.00) than in its mid range (0.07+/-0.54 for GPS 0.30-0.78). Estimated criterion specificity ranged from 95.2% (95% confidence interval, 76.1%-99.9%) to 96.8% (93.2%-98.5%). Twenty-five OHT subjects (12.6%) progressed by GPS, with 11 of the 25 (5.6%) also progressing by VF; 26 subjects (13.1%) progressed by VF alone. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in HRT GPS values between 0.30 and 0.78 should be interpreted with caution because the index has poorer reproducibility in this range. The global GPS progression algorithm performs at least as well as previously described rim area-based HRT progression strategies. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Zach Nadler; Bo Wang; Gadi Wollstein; Jessica E Nevins; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Richard Bilonick; Larry Kagemann; Ian A Sigal; R Daniel Ferguson; Ankit Patel; Daniel X Hammer; Joel S Schuman Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 3.732