Literature DB >> 20045506

Social disparity and the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia in a publicly funded health care system.

Ning Liu1, Shi Wu Wen, Douglas G Manual, Wendy Katherine, Jim Bottomley, Mark C Walker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the difference in use of labor epidural analgesia among women from different neighborhood socioeconomic groups. STUDY
DESIGN: Neighborhood socioeconomic variables from the 2001 Canadian Census were linked to singleton vaginal births from the Niday perinatal database (2004-2006) in Ontario, Canada. Births were divided into income and education groups by quintiles. Generalized estimating equations were employed to evaluate the association between labor epidural and neighborhood socioeconomic status. Supplementary analysis was conducted after stratifying data by hospital types.
RESULTS: Compared with those from the richest neighborhood, women from the poorest quintile were the least likely to receive labor epidural analgesia (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.61). The differences were smallest in teaching hospitals (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79) and largest in small community hospitals (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.64). Similar association was found in neighborhood education quintiles.
CONCLUSION: The use of labor epidural analgesia is decreased with decreasing neighborhood economic and education levels. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20045506     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  A prospective observational study of ethnic and racial differences in neuraxial labor analgesia request and pain relief.

Authors:  Sylvia H Wilson; Matthew P Elliott; Bethany J Wolf; Latha Hebbar
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Alberto Jiménez-Puente; Nicolás Benítez-Parejo; Jorge Del Diego-Salas; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz; Claudio Maañón-Di Leo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Risk factors associated with epidural use.

Authors:  Samuel M Lancaster; Ursula M Schick; Morwan M Osman; Daniel A Enquobahrie
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2012-03-23

4.  Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Request for Labor Epidural Analgesia in a Tertiary Obstetric Hospital in Vietnam.

Authors:  Lam D Nguyen; Anh D Nguyen; Michaela K Farber; Chi T Phan; Luong T Khuat; Ha T Nguyen; Tuan M Dang; Ha T Ngoc Doan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Neuraxial Analgesia in Pregnant Hispanic Women: An Assessment of Their Beliefs and Expectations.

Authors:  Basilia Gonzalez; Santiago R Gonzalez; Martha Rojo; Jill Mhyre
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2021-01-13

6.  Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery and Severe Maternal Morbidity.

Authors:  Jean Guglielminotti; Ruth Landau; Jamie Daw; Alexander M Friedman; Stanford Chihuri; Guohua Li
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Allophone immigrant women's knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Melissa Dominicé Dao; Désirée Gerosa; Iris Pélieu; Guy Haller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  United States State-Level Variation in the Use of Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor for Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Alexander J Butwick; Jason Bentley; Cynthia A Wong; Jonathan M Snowden; Eric Sun; Nan Guo
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07

9.  Data Resource Profile: Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario.

Authors:  Malia S Q Murphy; Deshayne B Fell; Ann E Sprague; Daniel J Corsi; Shelley Dougan; Sandra I Dunn; Vivian Holmberg; Tianhua Huang; Moya Johnson; Michael Kotuba; Lise Bisnaire; Pranesh Chakraborty; Susan Richardson; Mari Teitelbaum; Mark C Walker
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 7.196

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.