Literature DB >> 20045497

Effects of statins vs. non-statin lipid-lowering therapy on bone formation and bone mineral density biomarkers in patients with hyperlipidemia.

Somlak Chuengsamarn1, Suthee Rattanamongkoulgul, Somponge Suwanwalaikorn, Somkiat Wattanasirichaigoon, Larry Kaufman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, named statins, are well-established cholesterol-lowering drugs able to reduce cardiovascular risk in hypercholesterolemic patients. The possible effect of statin on bone tissue, so-called pleiotropic effects has received particular attention. Studies reported a positive effect of statin on bone tissue in both of animal and human study by enhancing the expression of the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), in particular of BMP2, which in turn leads to osteoblast differentiation and bone formation including interfering with osteoclastic activity. In a systematic review, the lipophilic statin as simvastatin had positive effect to bone mineral density (BMD) better than the more hydrophilic statin such as atorvastatin and fluvastatin. This study was aimed to compare efficacy of medical therapy between HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and non-HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor group to changing of bone mineral density and bone markers in the patients with hyperlipidemia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized control trial study enrolled the 212 hyperlipidemia with osteopenia patients to study in year 2006-2008. All subjects were randomized to 2 groups between statin and non-statin group; the patients were screened by inclusion criteria and measured in bone mineral density (BMD), bone marker and blood chemistry. All data were analyzed by difference of changing in bone marker and BMD between statin and non-statin groups using paired t test.
RESULTS: The present study showed 212 hyperlipidemia with osteopenia patients of which 106 patients in statin group had mean age (63.17+/-9.51 years) and the same number of patients in non-statin group had mean age (60.96+/-8.9 years). All subjects were 63 patients in male and 149 patients in female. Difference of bone formation marker and BMD between after and before was significantly higher than in statin group and the difference of bone resorption marker was also significantly lower than in statin group.
CONCLUSION: The lipophilic statin as moderate to high dose of simvastatin had beneficial positive effect to increasing BMD and could be additive use for prevention of bone loss in hyperlipidemia patients. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20045497     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  20 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of statins for osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T An; J Hao; S Sun; R Li; M Yang; G Cheng; M Zou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Fiona Taylor; Mark D Huffman; Ana Filipa Macedo; Theresa H M Moore; Margaret Burke; George Davey Smith; Kirsten Ward; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

3.  Comparative impact of systemic delivery of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin on bone mineral density of the ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Mostafa Shahrezaee; Ahmad Oryan; Farshid Bastami; Sepanta Hosseinpour; Mohammad Hossein Shahrezaee; Amir Kamali
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Novel applications of statins for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Sarita R Shah; Caroline A Werlang; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 17.275

5.  Bone mineral density in statin users: a population-based analysis from a Spanish cohort.

Authors:  José L Hernández; José M Olmos; Galo Romaña; Josefina Martinez; Jesús Castillo; Irina Yezerska; Gabriel Pinedo; Jesús González-Macías
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Effects of hyperlipidemia on trabecular and cortical structures of the mandible.

Authors:  Dilara Nil Günaçar; Hatice Yemenoğlu; Gülbahar Ustaoğlu; Özkan Arıöz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 7.  Molecular targets of statins and their potential side effects: Not all the glitter is gold.

Authors:  Kush K Patel; Viren S Sehgal; Khosrow Kashfi
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Atorvastatin-loaded micelles with bone-targeted ligand for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yonghui Xie; Xueying Tan; Jian Huang; Hongwei Huang; Ping Zou; Jingbo Hu
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.419

Review 9.  Mechanisms of bone anabolism regulated by statins.

Authors:  Feng Ruan; Qiang Zheng; Jinfu Wang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Improvement of Osseointegration by Ultraviolet and/or Simvastatin Treatment on Titanium Implants with or without Bone Graft Materials.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Jun; Kyung Chul Oh; Kyu-Hyung Park; Narae Jung; Jiayi Li; Hong Seok Moon
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.