Literature DB >> 20045387

Application of the Goes double-skin peri-areolar mastopexy with and without implants: A 14-year experience.

Donn M Hickman1.   

Abstract

Peri-areolar mastopexy is commonly used for mild ptosis requiring no more than 3cm of nipple elevation. The nature of areolar scar and gland remodelling inherent to a circular skin reduction prompts circumspection when correcting more moderate-to-severe cases. The purpose herein is to convey the reproducibility and applicability of the Goes double-skin peri-areolar mastopexy without mesh, for breast ptosis requiring nipple elevation of 4-9cm, in a series outside the work of the principal innovator. A series of 217 consecutive patients underwent circumareolar eccentric skin excision based on four cardinal landmarks, deepithelialised dermal sleeve and glandular reshaping with and without implants (174 augmentation-mastopexies and 43 mastopexies). Implantation and implant change involved the use of saline implants placed in the subpectoral space. Average nipple elevation was 5.1cm in the augmentation-mastopexy group and 6.5cm in the mastopexy group. There were major complications in 4.4% of breasts and occurred only in the mastopexy-augmentation group. There was no nipple loss, serious infection or haematoma. There were minor complications in 13.1% of breasts (11.8% in the mastopexy-augmentation group, and 18.6% in the mastopexy group). A minimal (10%) areolar necrosis occurred on a breast in one patient undergoing augmentation-mastopexy for tubular breasts with micromastia. Revision rate was 4% for the entire series. Based on the principles of circular skin design with fixed skin landmarks, internal breast shaping and special attention when augmentation is done simultaneously, the peri-areolar double-skin mastopexy can be safe, effective and reproducible when applied to cases of increasing complexity. Copyright Â
© 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20045387     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

1.  A Comparison of 28 Published Augmentation/Mastopexy Techniques Using Photographic Measurements.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-21

Review 2.  Ptosis and Bottoming out Following Mastopexy and Reduction Mammoplasty. Is Synthetic Mesh Internal Breast Support the Solution? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bishara Atiyeh; Fadi Ghieh; Fadel Chahine; Ahmad Oneisi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  A Simple Algorithm for Immediate Postmastectomy Reconstruction of the Small Breast-A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Magelia Kitcat; Alexandra Molina; Charlotte Meldon; Nagham Darhouse; Jon Clibbon; Charles M Malata
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-12-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.