Literature DB >> 20044801

The biological, clinical and prognostic implications of p53 transcriptional pathways in breast cancers.

Tarek M Abdel-Fatah1, Desmond G Powe, Johnson Agboola, Martyna Adamowicz-Brice, Roger W Blamey, Maria A Lopez-Garcia, Andrew R Green, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that the functional status of p53 transcriptional pathways, rather than p53 protein expression alone, could accurately discriminate between low- and high-risk breast carcinoma (BC) and inform about individuals' tumour biological behaviour. To test this, we studied a well-characterized series of 990 BCs with long-term follow-up, immunohistochemically profiled for p53, its main regulators and downstream genes. Results were validated in an independent series of patients (n = 245) uniformly treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Eleven p53 transcriptional phenotypes were identified with just two main clinical outcomes. (a) Low risk/good prognosis group (active/partially inactive p53 pathways), defined as p53(+/-)/MDM4(+)/MDM2(+/-)/Bcl2(+/-)/p21(+/-), p53(-)/MDM4(-)/MDM2(+)/Bcl2(+)/p21(+/-) and p53(+/-)/MDM4(-)/MMD2(-)/Bcl2(+)/p21(+/-). These tumours had favourable clinicopathological characteristics, including ER(+) and long survival after systemic adjuvant-therapy (AT). (b) High risk/poor prognosis group (completely inactive p53 pathways), defined as p53(+/-)/MDM4(-) MDM2(-)/Bcl2(-)/p21(-), p53(-)/MDM4(-) MDM2(+)/Bcl2(-)/p21(-) and p53(+/-)/MDM4(-)/MDM2(-)/Bcl2(-)/p21(+). These tumours were characterized by aggressive clinicopathological characteristics and showed shortened survival when treated with AT. Completely inactive p53 pathways but intact p21 axis p53(+/-)/MDM4(-)/MDM2(-)/Bcl2(-)/p21(+) had the worst prognosis, particularly patients who received AT. Multivariate Cox regression models, including validated prognostic factors for both test and validation series, revealed that the functional status of p53 transcriptional pathways was an independent prognosticator for BC-specific survival (HR 2.64 and 4.5, p < 0.001, respectively) and disease-free survival (HR 1.93 and 2.5, p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, p53 functional status determined by assessment of p53 regulatory and downstream targets provides independent prognostic value and may help determine more adequate therapeutic regimens for specific subgroups of breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20044801     DOI: 10.1002/path.2663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  27 in total

Review 1.  Translating p53 into the clinic.

Authors:  Chit Fang Cheok; Chandra S Verma; José Baselga; David P Lane
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Expression of WTH3 in breast cancer tissue and the effects on the biological behavior of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Lin Gan; Guoqing Zuo; Ting Wang; Jie Min; Yadong Wang; Yongyue Wang; Gang Lv
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  [Histological grading of breast cancer].

Authors:  M Christgen; F Länger; H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Identification of metastasis-associated breast cancer genes using a high-resolution whole genome profiling approach.

Authors:  Mohamed M Desouki; Shaoxi Liao; Huayi Huang; Jeffrey Conroy; Norma J Nowak; Lori Shepherd; Daniel P Gaile; Joseph Geradts
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Subcellular localization of Mdm2 expression and prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Hyung Seok Park; Ji Min Park; Seho Park; Junghoon Cho; Seung Il Kim; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Checkpoint Kinase 1 Expression Predicts Poor Prognosis in Nigerian Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Henry Okuchukwu Ebili; Victoria O Iyawe; Kikelomo Rachel Adeleke; Babatunde Abayomi Salami; Adekunbiola Aina Banjo; Chris Nolan; Emad Rakha; Ian Ellis; Andrew Green; Ayodeji Olayinka Johnson Agboola
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Immunophenotypic and genomic characterization of papillary carcinomas of the breast.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Duprez; Paul M Wilkerson; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Maryou B Lambros; Alan MacKay; Roger A'Hern; Arnaud Gauthier; Vidya Pawar; Pierre-Emanuel Colombo; Frances Daley; Rachael Natrajan; Eric Ward; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Flavie Arbion; Patrick Michenet; Britta Weigelt; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Genomic and mutational profiling of ductal carcinomas in situ and matched adjacent invasive breast cancers reveals intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity and clonal selection.

Authors:  Lucia Hernandez; Paul M Wilkerson; Maryou B Lambros; Adriana Campion-Flora; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Arnaud Gauthier; Cecilia Cabral; Vidya Pawar; Alan Mackay; Roger A'Hern; Caterina Marchiò; Jose Palacios; Rachael Natrajan; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Primary breast cancer stem-like cells metastasise to bone, switch phenotype and acquire a bone tropism signature.

Authors:  L D'Amico; S Patanè; C Grange; B Bussolati; C Isella; L Fontani; L Godio; M Cilli; P D'Amelio; G Isaia; E Medico; R Ferracini; I Roato
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Calpain system protein expression in basal-like and triple-negative invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  S J Storr; K W Lee; C M Woolston; S Safuan; A R Green; R D Macmillan; A Benhasouna; T Parr; I O Ellis; S G Martin
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.