Literature DB >> 20044342

Uncertainty during breast diagnostic evaluation: state of the science.

Mariann Montgomery1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To present the state of the science on uncertainty in relationship to the experiences of women undergoing diagnostic evaluation for suspected breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: Published articles from Medline, CINAHL, PubMED, and PsycINFO from 1983-2008 using the following key words: breast biopsy, mammography, uncertainty, reframing, inner strength, and disruption. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fifty research studies were examined with all reporting the presence of anxiety persisting throughout the diagnostic evaluation until certitude is achieved through the establishment of a definitive diagnosis. Indirect determinants of uncertainty for women undergoing breast diagnostic evaluation include measures of anxiety, depression, social support, emotional responses, defense mechanisms, and the psychological impact of events.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding and influencing the uncertainty experience have been suggested to be key in relieving psychosocial distress and positively influencing future screening behaviors. Several studies examine correlational relationships among anxiety, selection of coping methods, and demographic factors that influence uncertainty. A gap exists in the literature with regard to the relationship of inner strength and uncertainty. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses can be invaluable in assisting women in coping with the uncertainty experience by providing positive communication and support. Nursing interventions should be designed and tested for their effects on uncertainty experienced by women undergoing a breast diagnostic evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20044342     DOI: 10.1188/10.ONF.77-83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  11 in total

1.  Psychological distress, social withdrawal, and coping following receipt of an abnormal mammogram among different ethnicities: a mediation model.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Noah Espinoza; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  'The thing is not knowing': patients' perspectives on surveillance of an indeterminate pulmonary nodule.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Michael K Gould; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Jack A Clark
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  What do you mean, a spot?: A qualitative analysis of patients' reactions to discussions with their physicians about pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Michael K Gould; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Jack A Clark
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Disparities in abnormal mammogram follow-up time for Asian women compared with non-Hispanic white women and between Asian ethnic groups.

Authors:  Kim H Nguyen; Rena J Pasick; Susan L Stewart; Karla Kerlikowske; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prevalence of depression, trait anxiety, and social support during the diagnostic phases of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nor Zuraida Zainal; Chong Guan Ng; Angelvene Wong; Beatrice Andrew; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Sue-Yin Low
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-17

7.  Psychological impact of male breast disorders: literature review and survey results.

Authors:  Mike Kipling; Jane E M Ralph; Keith Callanan
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Microvascular Ultrasonic Imaging of Angiogenesis Identifies Tumors in a Murine Spontaneous Breast Cancer Model.

Authors:  Sarah E Shelton; Jodi Stone; Fei Gao; Donglin Zeng; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2020-02-06

9.  The Emotional Status, Attitudes in Decision-Making Process, and Their Impact on Surgical Choices in Korean Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sook Young Jeon; Kyoung-Eun Kim; Eun-Kyu Kim; Hyunhee Han; Han-Byoel Lee; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh; Hyeong-Gon Moon
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Symptom distress associated with biopsy in women with suspect breast lesions.

Authors:  Jayesh Kamath; Dean G Cruess; Kevin Claffey; Lori Wilson; Natalie Phoenix; Susan Tannenbaum
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.