PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patient navigation in a comprehensive community cancer center affects patient and staff perceptions of patient preparation for treatment, access to care, and overall satisfaction. DESIGN: Program evaluation with patient and staff surveys. SETTING: Comprehensive community cancer center accredited by the American College of Surgeons in the southeastern United States with 1,037 analytic cases of cancer in 2007; population of the main county served is about 177,963. SAMPLE: 48 patients (28 navigator and 20 non-navigator) and 26 employees, including physicians, nurses, and other support staff. METHODS: A 10-item survey with Likert scale format was sent to a stratified sample of 100 newly diagnosed patients with cancer. A five-item survey with the same format was sent to 40 staff working with the patients. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLE: Patient navigation. FINDINGS: Patients who received navigation services responded more positively to survey statements. Statistical significance (p > 0.05) was identified in 7 of 10 statements when patient groups were compared. Provider responses indicated agreement with all five statements included in the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer and oncology staff reported that patient navigation is effective in increasing patient satisfaction and decreasing barriers to care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Patient navigation is an emerging trend in cancer care. Patient navigators can play a significant role in assisting patients with coordinating services across the continuum of care. Continued research is essential in refining the role and eminence of patient navigators.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patient navigation in a comprehensive community cancer center affects patient and staff perceptions of patient preparation for treatment, access to care, and overall satisfaction. DESIGN: Program evaluation with patient and staff surveys. SETTING: Comprehensive community cancer center accredited by the American College of Surgeons in the southeastern United States with 1,037 analytic cases of cancer in 2007; population of the main county served is about 177,963. SAMPLE: 48 patients (28 navigator and 20 non-navigator) and 26 employees, including physicians, nurses, and other support staff. METHODS: A 10-item survey with Likert scale format was sent to a stratified sample of 100 newly diagnosed patients with cancer. A five-item survey with the same format was sent to 40 staff working with the patients. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLE: Patient navigation. FINDINGS:Patients who received navigation services responded more positively to survey statements. Statistical significance (p > 0.05) was identified in 7 of 10 statements when patient groups were compared. Provider responses indicated agreement with all five statements included in the survey. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with cancer and oncology staff reported that patient navigation is effective in increasing patient satisfaction and decreasing barriers to care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Patient navigation is an emerging trend in cancer care. Patient navigators can play a significant role in assisting patients with coordinating services across the continuum of care. Continued research is essential in refining the role and eminence of patient navigators.
Authors: Martin P Charns; Mary K Foster; Elaine C Alligood; Justin K Benzer; James F Burgess; Donna Li; Nathalie M McIntosh; Allison Burness; Melissa R Partin; Steven B Clauser Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2012-05
Authors: Pascal Jean-Pierre; Kevin Fiscella; Paul C Winters; Electra Paskett; Kristen Wells; Tracy Battaglia Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Amy Boylan; Michele Sargent; David Koop; Deb Brunette; Shalini Kanekar; Vanessa Shortbull; Kevin Molloy; Daniel G Petereit Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kristen J Wells; Kevin Campbell; Ambuj Kumar; Tatianna Clark; Pascal Jean-Pierre Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 3.603