Literature DB >> 20044281

Individual differences in metacontrast masking are enhanced by perceptual learning.

Thorsten Albrecht1, Susan Klapötke, Uwe Mattler.   

Abstract

In vision research metacontrast masking is a widely used technique to reduce the visibility of a stimulus. Typically, studies attempt to reveal general principles that apply to a large majority of participants and tend to omit possible individual differences. The neural plasticity of the visual system, however, entails the potential capability for individual differences in the way observers perform perceptual tasks. We report a case of perceptual learning in a metacontrast masking task that leads to the enhancement of two types of adult human observers despite identical learning conditions. In a priming task both types of observers exhibited the same priming effects, which were insensitive to learning. Findings suggest that visual processing of target stimuli in the metacontrast masking task is based on neural levels with sufficient plasticity to enable the development of two types of observers, which do not contribute to processing of target stimuli in the priming task. 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20044281     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  10 in total

1.  Response control by primes, targets, and distractors: from feedforward activation to controlled inhibition.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-05

2.  Visual processing in rapid-chase systems: image processing, attention, and awareness.

Authors:  Thomas Schmidt; Anke Haberkamp; G Marina Veltkamp; Andreas Weber; Anna Seydell-Greenwald; Filipp Schmidt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-15

3.  The effects of spatial and temporal cueing on metacontrast masking.

Authors:  Maximilian Bruchmann; Philipp Hintze; Simon Mota
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-22

4.  Dos and don'ts in response priming research.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Anke Haberkamp; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-12-22

5.  Invisible Stimuli, Implicit Thresholds: Why Invisibility Judgments Cannot be Interpreted in Isolation.

Authors:  Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 6.  Visual perception from the perspective of a representational, non-reductionistic, level-dependent account of perception and conscious awareness.

Authors:  Morten Overgaard; Jesper Mogensen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Invisibility and interpretation.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Frouke Hermens; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-17

8.  Ensemble modeling of auditory streaming reveals potential sources of bistability across the perceptual hierarchy.

Authors:  David F Little; Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Can common functional gene variants affect visual discrimination in metacontrast masking?

Authors:  Margus Maksimov; Mariliis Vaht; Jaanus Harro; Talis Bachmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal Audiovisual Motion Prediction in 2D- vs. 3D-Environments.

Authors:  Sandra Dittrich; Tömme Noesselt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.