Literature DB >> 20044273

Investigation of motor unit recruitment during stimulated contractions of tibialis anterior muscle.

L Mesin1, E Merlo, R Merletti, C Orizio.   

Abstract

This work investigated motor unit (MU) recruitment during transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) of the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, using experimental and simulated data. Surface electromyogram (EMG) and torque were measured during electrically-elicited contractions at different current intensities, on eight healthy subjects. EMG detected during stimulation (M-wave) was simulated selecting the elicited MUs on the basis of: (a) the simulated current density distribution in the territory of each MU and (b) the excitation threshold characteristic of the MU. Exerted force was simulated by adding the contribution of each of the elicited MUs. The effects of different fat layer thickness (between 2 and 8mm), different distributions of excitation thresholds (random excitation threshold, higher threshold for larger MUs or smaller MUs), and different MU distributions within the muscle (random distribution, larger MU deeper in the muscle, smaller MU deeper) on EMG variables and torque were tested. Increase of the current intensity led to a first rapid increase of experimental M-wave amplitude, followed by a plateau. Further increases of the stimulation current determined an increase of the exerted force, without relevant changes of the M-wave. Similar results were obtained in simulations. Rate of change of conduction velocity (CV) and leading coefficient of the second order polynomial interpolating the force vs. stimulation level curve were estimated as a function of increasing current amplitudes. Experimental data showed an increase of estimated CV with increasing levels of the stimulation current (for all subjects) and a positive leading coefficient of force vs. stimulation current curve (for five of eight subjects). Simulations matched the experimental results only when larger MUs were preferably located deeper in the TA muscle (in line with a histochemical study). Marginal effect of MU excitation thresholds was observed, suggesting that MUs closer to the stimulation electrode are recruited first during TES regardless of their excitability. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20044273     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  11 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley.

Authors:  A J Bergquist; J M Clair; O Lagerquist; C S Mang; Y Okuma; D F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Failure of spinal paired associative stimulation to induce neuroplasticity in the human corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Steven C McGie; Kei Masani; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation on the anterior neck region: The impact of pulse duration and frequency on maximum amplitude tolerance and perceived discomfort.

Authors:  Ali Barikroo; Giselle Carnaby; Donald Bolser; Ronald Rozensky; Michael Crary
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Motor unit distribution and recruitment in spastic and non-spastic bilateral biceps brachii muscles of chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yen-Ting Chen; Chuan Zhang; Ping Zhou; Sheng Li; Yingchun Zhang
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle function.

Authors:  Barbara M Doucet; Amy Lam; Lisa Griffin
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2012-06-25

Review 6.  The effectiveness of FES-evoked EMG potentials to assess muscle force and fatigue in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Morufu Olusola Ibitoye; Eduardo H Estigoni; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab; Glen M Davis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Interpreting Signal Amplitudes in Surface Electromyography Studies in Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Israel Halperin; Gregory J Lehman; Gabriel S Trajano; Taian M Vieira
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation and Dysphagia Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ali Barikroo
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2020-05-11

9.  Profiling of age-related changes in the tibialis anterior muscle proteome of the mdx mouse model of dystrophinopathy.

Authors:  Steven Carberry; Margit Zweyer; Dieter Swandulla; Kay Ohlendieck
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-03

Review 10.  Why brain-controlled neuroprosthetics matter: mechanisms underlying electrical stimulation of muscles and nerves in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Cesar Marquez-Chin; Kei Masani; Masayuki Hirata; Taishin Nomura; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.