OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a content valid, understandable, readable, and reliable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease knowledge Questionnaire (COPD-Q). METHODS: Twenty-one questions were generated as potential items to include in the COPD-Q. Twenty-two content experts provided both qualitative and quantitative assessments of two COPD-Q drafts. Ten patient volunteers completed a field test to assess clarity of individual COPD-Q items. An additional 24 patient volunteers completed a pilot test to determine internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the COPD-Q. The Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) was used to assess reading grade level of the COPD-Q. RESULTS: Thirteen items were rated as "essential" (content validity ratio= p <0.05) by content experts and composed the final COPD-Q. Internal consistency, using Cronbach's alpha, was 0.72. Test-retest reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficient, was 0.90. The FRE score of the COPD-Q was 74.7 (equivalent to a 5th grade reading level). CONCLUSION: The COPD-Q is a valid, readable and reliable knowledge assessment instrument for assessing COPD knowledge in patients who may have low health literacy skills. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care providers can use the COPD-Q to tailor counseling efforts according to individual patient needs, and to assess the effectiveness of their educational interventions. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a content valid, understandable, readable, and reliable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease knowledge Questionnaire (COPD-Q). METHODS: Twenty-one questions were generated as potential items to include in the COPD-Q. Twenty-two content experts provided both qualitative and quantitative assessments of two COPD-Q drafts. Ten patient volunteers completed a field test to assess clarity of individual COPD-Q items. An additional 24 patient volunteers completed a pilot test to determine internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the COPD-Q. The Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) was used to assess reading grade level of the COPD-Q. RESULTS: Thirteen items were rated as "essential" (content validity ratio= p <0.05) by content experts and composed the final COPD-Q. Internal consistency, using Cronbach's alpha, was 0.72. Test-retest reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficient, was 0.90. The FRE score of the COPD-Q was 74.7 (equivalent to a 5th grade reading level). CONCLUSION: The COPD-Q is a valid, readable and reliable knowledge assessment instrument for assessing COPD knowledge in patients who may have low health literacy skills. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care providers can use the COPD-Q to tailor counseling efforts according to individual patient needs, and to assess the effectiveness of their educational interventions. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Michael L Stellefson; Jonathan J Shuster; Beth H Chaney; Samantha R Paige; Julia M Alber; J Don Chaney; P S Sriram Journal: Health Commun Date: 2017-09-05
Authors: Fernando J Martinez; Alvar Agusti; Bartolome R Celli; MeiLan K Han; James P Allinson; Surya P Bhatt; Peter Calverley; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Badrul Chowdhury; Patrick Darken; Carla A Da Silva; Gavin Donaldson; Paul Dorinsky; Mark Dransfield; Rosa Faner; David M Halpin; Paul Jones; Jerry A Krishnan; Nicholas Locantore; Fernando D Martinez; Hana Mullerova; David Price; Klaus F Rabe; Colin Reisner; Dave Singh; Jørgen Vestbo; Claus F Vogelmeier; Robert A Wise; Ruth Tal-Singer; Jadwiga A Wedzicha Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nienke Nakken; Daisy J A Janssen; Esther H A van den Bogaart; Jean W M Muris; Jan H Vercoulen; Frank L Custers; Gerben P Bootsma; Michiel H M Gronenschild; Emiel F M Wouters; Martijn A Spruit Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Nicole M Robertson; Trishul Siddharthan; Suzanne L Pollard; Patricia Alupo; Oscar Flores-Flores; Natalie A Rykiel; Elisa D Romani; Ivonne Ascencio-Días; Bruce Kirenga; William Checkley; John R Hurst; Shumonta Quaderi Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2021-08
Authors: Sharyn K Burns; Bruce Maycock; Janina Hildebrand; Yun Zhao; Steve Allsop; Roanna Lobo; Peter Howat Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Trishul Siddharthan; Suzanne L Pollard; Shumonta A Quaderi; Andrew J Mirelman; Maria Kathia Cárdenas; Bruce Kirenga; Natalie A Rykiel; J Jaime Miranda; Laxman Shrestha; Ram K Chandyo; Adithya Cattamanchi; Susan Michie; Julie Barber; William Checkley; John R Hurst Journal: Trials Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 2.279