Audrey Sabbagh1, Pierre Darlu, Michel Vidaud. 1. INSERM UMR745, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France. audrey.sabbagh@parisdescartes.fr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetically determined differences in N-acetylation capacity have proved to be important determinants of both the effectiveness of therapeutic response and the development of adverse drug reactions and toxicity during drug treatment. NAT2PRED is a web-server that allows a fast determination of NAT2 acetylation phenotype from genotype data without taking the extra step of reconstructing haplotypes for each individual (publicly available at http://nat2pred.rit.albany.edu). However, the classification accuracy of NAT2PRED needs to be assessed before its application can be advocated at a large scale. METHODS: The ability of NAT2PRED to classify individuals according to their acetylation status (slow, intermediate and rapid acetylators) was evaluated in a worldwide dataset composed of 56 population samples (8,489 individuals) from four continental regions. RESULTS: NAT2PRED correctly identified slow acetylators with a sensitivity above 99% for all populations outside sub-Saharan Africa. Nevertheless, NAT2PRED showed a poor ability to distinguish between intermediate and rapid acetylators, with a classification error rate reaching up to 10% in the non-African samples. CONCLUSION: NAT2PRED is an excellent tool to infer the individual acetylation status from NAT2 genotype data when the main interest is to distinguish slow acetylators from the others. This should facilitate the determination of the individual acetylation status in routine clinical practice and lead to better monitoring of risks associated with cancer and adverse drug reactions.
BACKGROUND: Genetically determined differences in N-acetylation capacity have proved to be important determinants of both the effectiveness of therapeutic response and the development of adverse drug reactions and toxicity during drug treatment. NAT2PRED is a web-server that allows a fast determination of NAT2 acetylation phenotype from genotype data without taking the extra step of reconstructing haplotypes for each individual (publicly available at http://nat2pred.rit.albany.edu). However, the classification accuracy of NAT2PRED needs to be assessed before its application can be advocated at a large scale. METHODS: The ability of NAT2PRED to classify individuals according to their acetylation status (slow, intermediate and rapid acetylators) was evaluated in a worldwide dataset composed of 56 population samples (8,489 individuals) from four continental regions. RESULTS:NAT2PRED correctly identified slow acetylators with a sensitivity above 99% for all populations outside sub-Saharan Africa. Nevertheless, NAT2PRED showed a poor ability to distinguish between intermediate and rapid acetylators, with a classification error rate reaching up to 10% in the non-African samples. CONCLUSION:NAT2PRED is an excellent tool to infer the individual acetylation status from NAT2 genotype data when the main interest is to distinguish slow acetylators from the others. This should facilitate the determination of the individual acetylation status in routine clinical practice and lead to better monitoring of risks associated with cancer and adverse drug reactions.
Authors: S Fuselli; R H Gilman; S J Chanock; S L Bonatto; G De Stefano; C A Evans; D Labuda; D Luiselli; F M Salzano; G Soto; G Vallejo; A Sajantila; D Pettener; E Tarazona-Santos Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: José A G Agúndez; Klaus Golka; Carmen Martínez; Silvia Selinski; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Elena García-Martín Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Raquel L F Teixeira; Antonio B Miranda; Antonio G Pacheco; Márcia Q P Lopes; Joseane Fonseca-Costa; Marcelo F Rabahi; Hedi M Melo; Afrânio L Kritski; Fernanda C Q Mello; Philip N Suffys; Adalberto R Santos Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 2.433
Authors: Olayinka A Kotila; Olufunmilayo I Fawole; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Adejumoke I Ayede; Adeyinka G Falusi; Chinedum P Babalola Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Kamunkhwala Gausi; Elisa H Ignatius; Xin Sun; Soyeon Kim; Laura Moran; Lubbe Wiesner; Florian von Groote-Bidlingmaier; Richard Hafner; Kathleen Donahue; Naadira Vanker; Susan L Rosenkranz; Susan Swindells; Andreas H Diacon; Eric L Nuermberger; Kelly E Dooley; Paolo Denti Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kelly S Levano; Luis Jaramillo-Valverde; David D Tarazona; Cesar Sanchez; Silvia Capristano; Tania Vásquez-Loarte; Lely Solari; Alberto Mendoza-Ticona; Alonso Soto; Christian Rojas; Roberto Zegarra-Chapoñan; Heinner Guio Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2021-09-12 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Luis Jaramillo-Valverde; Kelly S Levano; David D Tarazona; Silvia Capristano; Roberto Zegarra-Chapoñan; Cesar Sanchez; Velia M Yufra-Picardo; Eduardo Tarazona-Santos; Cesar Ugarte-Gil; Heinner Guio Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: Neil E Rens; Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Julio Croda; Jason R Andrews Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 9.079