Literature DB >> 20043768

Posterior decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve at the lumbosacral junction.

Morio Matsumoto1, Kota Watanabe, Ken Ishii, Takashi Tsuji, Hironari Takaishi, Masaya Nakamura, Yoshiaki Toyama, Kazuhiro Chiba.   

Abstract

OBJECT: In this paper, the authors' goal was to elucidate the clinical features and results of decompression surgery for extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with severe leg pain caused by extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction (18 men and 10 women; mean age 68.2 +/- 8.9 years) were treated by posterior decompression without fusion using a microendoscope in 19 patients and a surgical microscope or loupe in 9 patients. The decompression procedures consisted of partial resection of the sacral ala, the L-5 transverse process, and the L5-S1 facet joint along the L-5 spinal nerve. The following items were investigated: 1) preoperative neurological findings; 2) preoperative radiological findings, including plain radiographs, CT scans, selective radiculography of L-5; 3) surgical outcome as evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale for low-back pain (JOA score); and 4) need for revision surgery.
RESULTS: All patients presented with neurological deficits compatible with a diagnosis of L-5 radiculopathy such as weakness of the extensor hallucis longus muscle and sensory disturbance in the L-5 area together with neurogenic claudication. On plain radiographs, 21 patients (75%) and 17 patients (60.7%) exhibited lumbar scoliosis (>or= 5 degrees) and wedging of the L5-S1 intervertebral space (>or= 3 degrees), respectively. The CT scans demonstrated marked osteophyte formation at the posterolateral margin of the L5-S1 vertebral bodies, and a selective L-5 nerve root block was effective in all patients. All patients reported pain relief immediately after surgery. The mean JOA scores were 11.3 +/- 3.8 before surgery and 24.3 +/- 3.4 at the time of the final follow-up examination; the recovery rate was 68.6 +/- 16.5%. The mean estimated blood loss was 66.6 +/- 98.6 ml, and the mean surgical time was 135.3 +/- 46.5 minutes. No significant difference in the recovery rate of the JOA scores or in the surgical time and blood loss was observed between the 2 surgical approaches. Four patients underwent revision posterior interbody fusion for the recurrence of radicular pain as a result of intraforaminal stenosis in 3 patients and insufficient decompression of the extraforaminal area in the remaining patient at an average of 19.5 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction is a rare but distinct pathological condition causing L-5 radiculopathy. Decompression surgery without fusion using a microendoscope or a surgical microscope/loupe is a feasible and less invasive surgical option for elderly patients with extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20043768     DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE09344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  18 in total

1.  Comparative observational study of surgical outcomes of lumbar foraminal stenosis using minimally invasive microsurgical extraforaminal decompression alone versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Jin-Hwa Jeong; Hyeon-Guk Cho; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Management of an unusual sciatica.

Authors:  Anouar Bourghli; Ahmed Chaballout; Ibrahim Obeid; Louis Boissiere; Jean-Marc Vital; Ghassan Khoury
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of multifidus muscle spontaneous activity by needle electromyography for the detection of lumbar foraminal and lateral exit-zone stenosis.

Authors:  Mikinobu Takeuchi; Norimitsu Wakao; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Masahiko Gosho; Koji Osuka; Atsuhiko Hirasawa; Aichi Niwa; Masahiro Aoyama; Reo Kawaguchi; Hiroshi Shima; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Endoscopic decompression for intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression.

Authors:  Toshio Doi; Katsumi Harimaya; Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Osamu Tono; Kiyoshi Tarukado; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  L5 radiculopathy caused by L5 nerve root entrapment by an L5-S1 anterior osteophyte.

Authors:  Thomas Louis Jones; Michael S Hisey
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

6.  Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome.

Authors:  Sung-Ik Cho; Chung-Kee Chough; Shu-Chung Choi; Jin Young Chon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-10-24

7.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Microscopic Lumbar Foraminal Decompression: A Pilot Analysis of Possible Risk Factors for Restenosis.

Authors:  Shoichi Haimoto; Yusuke Nishimura; Masahito Hara; Yasuhiro Nakajima; Yu Yamamoto; Howard J Ginsberg; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Treatment results in the differential surgery of intradural extramedullary schwannoma of 110 cases.

Authors:  Shaohui Zong; Gaofeng Zeng; Chunxiang Xiong; Bo Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The pitfalls in surgical management of lumbar canal stenosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Tetsuryu Mitsuyama; Motoo Kubota; Masahito Yuzurihara; Masaki Mizuno; Ryo Hashimoto; Ryo Ando; Yoshikazu Okada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Navigated Transtubular Extraforaminal Decompression of the L5 Nerve Root at the Lumbosacral Junction: Clinical Data, Radiographic Features, and Outcome Analysis.

Authors:  P Stavrinou; R Härtl; B Krischek; C Kabbasch; A Mpotsaris; R Goldbrunner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.