Literature DB >> 20043154

Techniques for labia minora reduction: an algorithmic approach.

Warren A Ellsworth1, Mort Rizvi, Michael Lypka, Mark Gaon, Bruce Smith, Benjamin Cohen, Tue Dinh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aesthetic reduction of the labia minora has gained popularity, and a number of different techniques have been described. Each procedure has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. However, no algorithm has been defined for pairing the degree of deformity with the optimal surgical procedure.
METHODS: Patients were stratified into one of four groups based on labial size. The surgeon chose one of three reduction techniques based on the degree of labial hypertrophy and the patient's aesthetic preferences for labial edge color and contour. Three reduction techniques were used including the edge excision technique, the inferior wedge resection technique, and deepithelialization reduction labioplasty. The success of aesthetic reduction was evaluated, as was symptomatic relief.
RESULTS: The 12 procedures performed included five deepithelialization techniques, four edge excision techniques, and three inferior wedge resection techniques. As reported, 92% of the patients were "very satisfied" with their aesthetic and functional results. The complications were minimal, with three patients experiencing minor wound healing difficulties that resolved spontaneously. One patient who underwent the edge excision technique was "not satisfied" and complained of overreduction.
CONCLUSION: The authors found all three techniques for labia minora reduction to be useful in different clinical situations. A novel algorithm is described for matching the optimal surgical technique for each patient based on her degree of hypertrophy and aesthetic goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20043154     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-009-9454-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  9 in total

1.  Normal vulvovaginal, perineal, and pelvic anatomy with reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  Sujata Yavagal; Thais F de Farias; Carlos A Medina; Peter Takacs
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Female genital cosmetic surgery: a review of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Cheryl B Iglesia; Ladin Yurteri-Kaplan; Red Alinsod
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques, and ethics.

Authors:  Müjde Özer; Indiana Mortimore; Elise P Jansma; Margriet G Mullender
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Elements of morphology: standard terminology for the external genitalia.

Authors:  Raoul C M Hennekam; Judith E Allanson; Leslie G Biesecker; John C Carey; John M Opitz; Eric Vilain
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Audit of Female Genital Aesthetic Surgery: Changing Trends in India.

Authors:  Sejal Ajmera Desai; Varun V Dixit
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-04-13

6.  Premenarchal labia minora hypertrophy.

Authors:  Karoon Agrawal; Pankaj Kumar Patel; Shamendra Anand Sahu
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2016 May-Aug

7.  Labiaplasty with Stable Labia Minora Retraction-Butterfly-like Approach.

Authors:  Osvaldo Pereira Filho; Jorge Bins Ely; Kuang Hee Lee; Elizabeth Machado Paulo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-29

8.  The Butterfly Technique: A Retrospective Study for Labia Minora Reduction Using an Integrated Approach.

Authors:  Mathias Tremp; Carlo M Oranges; Dirk J Schaefer; Natascha J Waldkircher; Andrea C Schleh; Daniel F Kalbermatten
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-13

9.  Indications, Techniques and Complications of Labiaplasty.

Authors:  Arvind U Gowda; Nikki Chopra; Marwan Khalifeh
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-08-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.