Literature DB >> 20042867

Benefits and harms of sick leave: lack of randomized, controlled trials.

Inge Axelsson1, Sven-Uno Marnetoft.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to try to identify those randomized controlled trials that compare sick leave with no sick leave or a different duration or degree of sick leave. A comprehensive, systematic, electronic search of Clinical Evidence, the Cochrane Library and PubMed, and a manual search of the Campbell Library and a journal supplement was carried out. Only two studies with randomization of sick leave were found. Patients, who were suspected of having whiplash injuries following a car accident, were randomly assigned to either 14 days on sick leave wearing a neck collar, or no neck collar or sick leave, and employees with musculoskeletal disorders were randomized to part-time sick leave and work adjustments, or full-time sick leave. Over 99% of the studies on sick leave were observational. The reason for the scarcity of randomized controlled trials is unknown. There is a definite, urgent need for randomized, controlled studies of the effects that sick leave has on health issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20042867     DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32833638b9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  1 in total

1.  Correspondence in Stakeholder Assessment of Health, Work Capacity and Sick Leave in Workers with Comorbid Subjective Health Complaints? A Video Vignette Study.

Authors:  Silje Maeland; Liv Heide Magnussen; Hege R Eriksen; Erik L Werner; Anna Helle-Valle; Gunnel Hensing
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.