Literature DB >> 2004259

Motor reorganization after upper limb amputation in man. A study with focal magnetic stimulation.

L G Cohen1, S Bandinelli, T W Findley, M Hallett.   

Abstract

To evaluate reorganization in motor pathways following amputation, we studied motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation in 7 patients with unilateral upper limb amputations, a patient with congenital absence of a hand, and 10 normal subjects. Electromyographic recordings were made from biceps and deltoid muscles immediately proximal to the stump and the same contralateral muscles. Magnetic stimulation was delivered by a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator through a 'figure eight' magnetic coil over scalp positions separated by 1-2.5 cm. Maximal M responses were elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation at Erb's point. The amplitude of MEPs was expressed both as absolute values and as a percentage of maximal responses to peripheral nerve stimulation. Threshold for activation of muscles ipsilateral and contralateral to the stump and the region of excitable scalp positions were also determined in 7 patients. Magnetic scalp stimulation induced a sensation of movement in the missing hand or fingers in the patients with acquired amputation, but failed to do so in the patient with congenital absence of a limb. It evoked larger MEPs, recruited a larger percentage of the motoneuron pool, and elicited MEPs at lower intensities of stimulation in muscles ipsilateral to the stump than in contralateral muscles. Muscles ipsilateral to the stump could be activated from a larger area than those contralateral to the stump. These results are compatible with cortical or spinal reorganization in adult human motor pathways targeting muscles proximal to the stump after amputations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2004259     DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.1.615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  96 in total

1.  Reorganization in primary motor cortex of primates with long-standing therapeutic amputations.

Authors:  C W Wu; J H Kaas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials.

Authors:  L D Gugino; J R Romero; L Aglio; D Titone; M Ramirez; A Pascual-Leone; E Grimson; N Weisenfeld; R Kikinis; M E Shenton
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; John C Rothwell; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Modification of the human motor cortex by associative stimulation.

Authors:  H S Pyndt; M C Ridding
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Brain mechanisms for the formation of new movements during learning: the evolution of classical concepts.

Authors:  M E Ioffe
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01

Review 6.  Review of motor and phantom-related imagery.

Authors:  William S Anderson; Frederick A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 7.  Contemporary linkages between EMG, kinetics and stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler; Jay L Alberts; Min Wook Kim
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 8.  [Chronic pain : Perception, reward and neural processing].

Authors:  S Becker; M Diers
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: cortical motor maps in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  L J Streletz; J K Belevich; S M Jones; A Bhushan; S H Shah; G J Herbison
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  [Phantom limb pain. Psychological treatment strategies].

Authors:  M Diers; H Flor
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.