Alexander Ströhle1, Andreas Hahn, Anthony Sebastian. 1. Nutrition Physiology and Human Nutrition Unit, Institute of Food Science, Centre of Applied Chemistry, Leibniz University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nutrition scientists are showing growing interest in the diet patterns of preagricultural (hunter-gatherer) humans. Retrojected preagricultural diets are reportedly predominantly net base producing in contrast to the net acid-producing modern Western diets. OBJECTIVE: We examined the dietary net acid load [net endogenous acid production (NEAP)] for 229 worldwide historically studied hunter-gatherer societies to determine how differences in plant-to-animal (P:A) dietary subsistence patterns and differences in the percentage of body fat in prey animals affect the NEAP. DESIGN: With the use of 1) ethnographic data of dietary P:A ratios of hunter-gatherer populations, 2) established computational methods, and 3) knowledge that fat densities of animal foods consumed by hunter-gatherers varied between 3% and 20%, we computed the NEAP for the diets of 229 populations in 4 different models of animal fat densities (model A, 3%; model B, 10%; model C, 15%; model D, 20%). RESULTS: As P:A ratios decreased from 85:15 to 5:95, the NEAP increased from -178 to +181 mEq/d (model A) and from -185 to +120 mEq/d (models B and C). Approximately 50% of the diets consumed by the 229 worldwide hunter-gatherer populations were net acid producing (models B and C). In model D, 40% of the diets were net acid producing. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that the NEAP of hunter-gatherer diets becomes progressively more positive as P:A ratios decline. The high reliance on animal-based foods of a worldwide sample of historically studied hunter-gatherer populations renders their diets net acid producing in approximately 40-60% of subgroups of P:A ratios. Only further investigations can show the implications of these findings in determining the NEAP of human ancestral diets.
BACKGROUND: Nutrition scientists are showing growing interest in the diet patterns of preagricultural (hunter-gatherer) humans. Retrojected preagricultural diets are reportedly predominantly net base producing in contrast to the net acid-producing modern Western diets. OBJECTIVE: We examined the dietary net acid load [net endogenous acid production (NEAP)] for 229 worldwide historically studied hunter-gatherer societies to determine how differences in plant-to-animal (P:A) dietary subsistence patterns and differences in the percentage of body fat in prey animals affect the NEAP. DESIGN: With the use of 1) ethnographic data of dietary P:A ratios of hunter-gatherer populations, 2) established computational methods, and 3) knowledge that fat densities of animal foods consumed by hunter-gatherers varied between 3% and 20%, we computed the NEAP for the diets of 229 populations in 4 different models of animal fat densities (model A, 3%; model B, 10%; model C, 15%; model D, 20%). RESULTS: As P:A ratios decreased from 85:15 to 5:95, the NEAP increased from -178 to +181 mEq/d (model A) and from -185 to +120 mEq/d (models B and C). Approximately 50% of the diets consumed by the 229 worldwide hunter-gatherer populations were net acid producing (models B and C). In model D, 40% of the diets were net acid producing. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that the NEAP of hunter-gatherer diets becomes progressively more positive as P:A ratios decline. The high reliance on animal-based foods of a worldwide sample of historically studied hunter-gatherer populations renders their diets net acid producing in approximately 40-60% of subgroups of P:A ratios. Only further investigations can show the implications of these findings in determining the NEAP of human ancestral diets.
Authors: Mark P Mattson; David B Allison; Luigi Fontana; Michelle Harvie; Valter D Longo; Willy J Malaisse; Michael Mosley; Lucia Notterpek; Eric Ravussin; Frank A J L Scheer; Thomas N Seyfried; Krista A Varady; Satchidananda Panda Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Julia J Scialla; Lawrence J Appel; Brad C Astor; Edgar R Miller; Srinivasan Beddhu; Mark Woodward; Rulan S Parekh; Cheryl A M Anderson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: U Masharani; P Sherchan; M Schloetter; S Stratford; A Xiao; A Sebastian; M Nolte Kennedy; L Frassetto Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Max C Petersen; Molly R Gallop; Stephany Flores Ramos; Amir Zarrinpar; Josiane L Broussard; Maria Chondronikola; Amandine Chaix; Samuel Klein Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 46.500
Authors: Adebowale A Adeyemo; Daniel Shriner; Amy R Bentley; Rasheed A Gbadegesin; Charles N Rotimi Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 28.314