BACKGROUND:Harvesting of iliac crest graft for spinal fusions is associated with a number of patients reporting residual or chronic pain at the harvest site. Various interventions, including morphine infiltration, have been proposed to minimize the associated pain. METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study comparing intraoperative infiltration of 5 mg morphine (treatment) versus saline (placebo) into the iliac crest harvest site for patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Patients with myelopathy, excessive perioperative opioid use (60 mg equivalent morphine/d or more), or multilevel (>3 levels) spinal surgery were excluded. Postoperative administration of morphine (recovery room and patient-controlled analgesia) was standardized. Numerical pain scores specific for the iliac crest site were determined in the immediate postoperative period and at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients randomized, 47 (87%) were available for review with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The groups were similar in baseline age, gender, and comorbidities. There was no significant difference between groups in total use of postoperative morphine during the first 24 hours (P = 0.48). Repeated measures analysis of variance demonstrated no interacting effect of group over time for hip pain at rest (P = 0.94), hip pain while moving (P = 0.90), spine pain at rest (P = 0.99), or spine pain while moving (P = 0.83). The proportion of patients reporting iliac crest pain at 1-year follow-up was the same between groups (P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that there are no additional benefits for the use of intraoperative infiltration of morphine into the iliac crest harvest site during spinal fusions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Harvesting of iliac crest graft for spinal fusions is associated with a number of patients reporting residual or chronic pain at the harvest site. Various interventions, including morphine infiltration, have been proposed to minimize the associated pain. METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study comparing intraoperative infiltration of 5 mg morphine (treatment) versus saline (placebo) into the iliac crest harvest site for patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Patients with myelopathy, excessive perioperative opioid use (60 mg equivalent morphine/d or more), or multilevel (>3 levels) spinal surgery were excluded. Postoperative administration of morphine (recovery room and patient-controlled analgesia) was standardized. Numerical pain scores specific for the iliac crest site were determined in the immediate postoperative period and at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients randomized, 47 (87%) were available for review with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The groups were similar in baseline age, gender, and comorbidities. There was no significant difference between groups in total use of postoperative morphine during the first 24 hours (P = 0.48). Repeated measures analysis of variance demonstrated no interacting effect of group over time for hip pain at rest (P = 0.94), hip pain while moving (P = 0.90), spine pain at rest (P = 0.99), or spine pain while moving (P = 0.83). The proportion of patients reporting iliac crest pain at 1-year follow-up was the same between groups (P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that there are no additional benefits for the use of intraoperative infiltration of morphine into the iliac crest harvest site during spinal fusions.
Authors: Jennifer S Gewandter; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; John T Farrar; Roger B Fillingim; Ian Gilron; John D Markman; Anne Louise Oaklander; Michael J Polydefkis; Srinivasa N Raja; James P Robinson; Clifford J Woolf; Dan Ziegler; Michael A Ashburn; Laurie B Burke; Penney Cowan; Steven Z George; Veeraindar Goli; Ole X Graff; Smriti Iyengar; Gary W Jay; Joel Katz; Henrik Kehlet; Rachel A Kitt; Ernest A Kopecky; Richard Malamut; Michael P McDermott; Pamela Palmer; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; Ilona Steigerwald; Jeffrey Tobias; Gary A Walco Journal: Pain Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Fatma A El Sherif; Ahmad M Abd El-Rahman; Ahmed H Othman; Samia A Shouman; Mervat M Omran; Nivin A Hassan; Sahar B Hassan; Ebrahim Aboeleuon Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 3.133