Literature DB >> 20042067

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in resident animals of a long-term care facility.

K Coughlan1, K E Olsen, D Boxrud, J B Bender.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Animals provide benefits to elderly and chronically ill people by decreasing loneliness, increasing social interactions, and improving mental health. As a result, many hospitals and long-term care facilities allow family pets to visit ill or convalescing patients or support animal-assisted therapy programs. These include programs that have resident animals in long-term care facilities. Despite the benefits, there are concerns about disease transmission between pets and patients. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), are a recognized problem in healthcare settings leading to refractory infections and potentially life-threatening illnesses. MRSA has been isolated from numerous animal species, yet few studies are available on the carriage of this pathogen in animals residing in long-term care facilities. Our objective was to characterize MRSA carriage among resident animals in a long-term care facility.
METHODS: To document MRSA colonization, nasal swabs from 12 resident animals (one dogs and 11 cats) of a long-term care facility were collected weekly for 8 weeks. Staphylococcus isolates were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility and MRSA isolates were further characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). PFGE isolate patterns were compared with an existing database of MRSA isolate patterns at the Minnesota Department of Health.
RESULTS: Two of 11 cats were colonized with MRSA. MRSA was recovered from five of eight weekly samples in one cat and two of eight weekly samples in the other cat. All isolates were classified as USA100 (healthcare-associated strains). DISCUSSION: Long-term care resident animals may acquire MRSA. Clonally related strains were identified over the 8-week sampling period. It is unclear if pets serve as an on-going source of infection to their human companions in long-term care facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20042067     DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01302.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  8 in total

Review 1.  Canine-Assisted Interventions and the Relevance of Welfare Assessments for Human Health, and Transmission of Zoonosis: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Lieve Lucia Meers; Laura Contalbrigo; William Ellery Samuels; Carolina Duarte-Gan; Daniel Berckmans; Stephan Jens Laufer; Vicky Antoinette Stevens; Elizabeth Ann Walsh; Simona Normando
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 2.  Risks associated with animal-assisted intervention programs: A literature review.

Authors:  Kathryn R Dalton; Kaitlin B Waite; Kathy Ruble; Karen C Carroll; Alexandra DeLone; Pam Frankenfield; James A Serpell; Roland J Thorpe; Daniel O Morris; Jacqueline Agnew; Ronald C Rubenstein; Meghan F Davis
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.446

3.  Risk factors for persistence of livestock-associated MRSA and environmental exposure in veal calf farmers and their family members: an observational longitudinal study.

Authors:  Alejandro Dorado-García; Marian Eh Bos; Haitske Graveland; Brigitte Agl Van Cleef; Koen M Verstappen; Jan Ajw Kluytmans; Jaap A Wagenaar; Dick Jj Heederik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  The State of Animal-Assisted Interventions: Addressing the Contemporary Issues that will Shape the Future.

Authors:  Aubrey H Fine; Alan M Beck; Zenithson Ng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Animal assisted intervention: A systematic review of benefits and risks.

Authors:  Fabrizio Bert; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Elisa Camussi; Giulio Pieve; Gianluca Voglino; Roberta Siliquini
Journal:  Eur J Integr Med       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Improved understanding of factors driving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemic waves.

Authors:  Som S Chatterjee; Michael Otto
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Is the Colonisation of Staphylococcus aureus in Pets Associated with Their Close Contact with Owners?

Authors:  Karolina Bierowiec; Katarzyna Płoneczka-Janeczko; Krzysztof Rypuła
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing and Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in Companion and Animal-Assisted Interventions Dogs.

Authors:  Emanuela Roscetto; Chiara Varriale; Umberto Galdiero; Camilla Esposito; Maria Rosaria Catania
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.