Literature DB >> 20041930

Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer with special reference to pelvic floor dysfunction.

P Varpe1, H Huhtinen, A Rantala, P Salminen, P Rautava, S Hurme, J Grönroos.   

Abstract

AIM: Conventional outcomes such as survival, tumour recurrence and complication rates after surgery for rectal cancer have been rigorously assessed, but the importance of maintaining quality of life (QOL) after surgery for rectal cancer has received less attention. The aim of the current study was to analyse QOL and the occurrence of pelvic dysfunction after the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.
METHOD: Between May 2005 and May 2008, 150 patients with rectal cancer underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) or anterior resection (AR). Seventy-four answered two preoperative questionnaires. At a follow up of 1 year, 65 were alive without sign of recurrence and answered the same questionnaires: (a) validated RAND 36-item health survey QOL questionnaire; and (b) self-administered disease-related questionnaire with special reference to anorectal and urogenital function.
RESULTS: The postoperative general QOL was similar after surgery, and mental functioning was better (P < 0.001). Problems with physical functions were associated with anal dysfunction after AR (P < 0.001) and problems with social functioning were associated with urinary dysfunction (P = 0.038). At 1 year after surgery, urinary incontinence was worse (P = 0.026) after all operations, and the incidence of dysuria was higher after APR than AR (P = 0.001). Male sexual function also worsened (P = 0.060). Anorectal dysfunction caused more inconvenience among patients who underwent AR (P = 0.028). Preoperative radiation was associated with postoperative ejaculation problems (P = 0.028) and anal incontinence (P = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: Factors affecting QOL and pelvic floor function should be taken into account when making treatment decisions in rectal cancer.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20041930     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  12 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of tamsulosin for prevention of acute voiding difficulty after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Je-Ho Jang; Sung-Bum Kang; Sung-Min Lee; Jun-Seok Park; Duck-Woo Kim; Soyeon Ahn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Chang S Yu; Seok B Lim; Chan W Kim; Jong H Kim; Tae W Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy.

Authors:  Jørn Pachler; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

4.  Transanal excision with radiation therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nathan Tennyson; William M Mendenhall; Christopher G Morris; Emina H Huang; Robert A Zlotecki
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2012-09-20

5.  The impact of surgical modality on self-reported body image, quality of life and survivorship after anterior resection for colorectal cancer – a mixed methods study

Authors:  Dhruvin H. Hirpara; Arash Azin; Virginia Mulcahy; Emily Le Souder; Catherine O’Brien; Sami A. Chadi; Fayez A. Quereshy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Quality of Life after Rectal Cancer Resection Comparing Anterior Resection, Abdominoperineal Resection, and Complicated Cases.

Authors:  Jan Scheele; Johannes Lemke; Mathias Wittau; Silvia Sander; Doris Henne-Bruns; Marko Kornmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-01-17

Review 7.  Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Larissa K F Temple; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Robert Wu; Robin Boushey; Beth Potter; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of oncological outcome after abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Wang; De-Gang Li; Lei Li; Fan-Biao Kong; Li-Ming Pang; Wei Mai
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Late assessment of quality of life in patients with rectal carcinoma: comparison between sphincter preservation and definitive colostomy.

Authors:  Mariane Messias Reis Lima Silva; Samuel Aguiar Junior; Juliana de Aguiar Pastore; Érica Maria Monteiro Santos; Fábio de Oliveira Ferreira; Ranyell Matheus S B Spencer; Vinicius F Calsavara; Wilson Toshihiko Nakagawa; Ademar Lopes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.