Literature DB >> 20041917

Minimal anatomical disruption in stoma formation: the lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma (LRAPS).

B M Stephenson1, M D Evans, J Hilton, E S McKain, G L Williams.   

Abstract

AIM: Parastomal hernias are difficult to manage and recent attention has focused on their prevention including the use of prophylactic mesh at the time of initial surgery.
METHOD: A novel 'anatomical' approach to stoma formation, the lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma (LRAPS), involving minimal anterior abdominal wall disruption is described.
RESULTS: LRAPS was carried out electively (n = 25) or as an emergency (n = 4) for benign or malignant pathology. Twenty-two had a midline laparotomy and all types of stomas were fashioned. There were two early and three later deaths from advanced malignancy. No parastomal hernias have been detected at a mean follow-up of 13 (range 7-18) months and none detected by CT scanning in 20 of 24 patients with colorectal cancer at a mean follow-up of 14 (range 10-18) months.
CONCLUSION: LRAPS reduces the incidence of early stomal herniation.
© 2010 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2010 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20041917     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02178.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  9 in total

1.  Parastomal hernia repair outcomes in relation to stoma site with diisocyanate cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen mesh.

Authors:  N J Smart; R Velineni; D Khan; I R Daniels
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Comment to: Retrospective observational study on the incidence of incisional hernias after reversal of a temporary diverting ileostomy following rectal carcinoma resection with follow-up CT scans. De Keersmaecker G, Beckers R, Heindryckx E, Kyle-Leinhase I, Pletinckx P, Claeys D, Vanderstraeten E, Monsaert E, Muysoms F. Hernia 2015 (Epub ahead of print).

Authors:  J S Williamson; G L Williams; B M Stephenson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Avoiding inferior epigastric artery damage at stoma formation.

Authors:  J M Brown; G L Williams; B M Stephenson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Parastomal hernia and prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation: a commentary.

Authors:  J-B Cornille; I R Daniels; N J Smart
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Parastomal Hernia: Avoidance and Treatment in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Sean C Glasgow; Sekhar Dharmarajan
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

6.  Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation.

Authors:  Julia Hardt; Joerg J Meerpohl; Maria-Inti Metzendorf; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post; Florian Herrle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 7.  Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation.

Authors:  Huw G Jones; Michael Rees; Omar M Aboumarzouk; Joshua Brown; James Cragg; Peter Billings; Ben Carter; Palanichamy Chandran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-20

8.  Radiological progression of end colostomy trephine diameter and area.

Authors:  K K Ho; T Economou; N J Smart; I R Daniels
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-10-24

9.  Prophylactic retromuscular mesh placement for parastomal hernia prevention: a retrospective cohort study of permanent colostomies and ileostomies.

Authors:  Jonathan Frigault; Simon Lemieux; Dominic Breton; Philippe Bouchard; Alexandre Bouchard; Roger C Grégoire; François Letarte; Gilles Bouchard; Vincent Boun; Katia Massé; Sébastien Drolet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.739

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.