Literature DB >> 2004144

Rectal examination in patients with pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen.

J M Dixon1, R A Elton, J B Rainey, D A Macleod.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rectal examination provides any diagnostic information in patients admitted to hospital with pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen.
DESIGN: Casualty officer or surgical registrar recorded symptoms and signs on admission on detailed forms. Final diagnosis was noted on discharge from hospital.
SETTING: District general hospital. PATIENTS: 1204 Consecutive patients admitted to hospital with pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen as their major complaint; 1028 had a rectal examination on admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratio for each symptom and sign related to final diagnosis. Results of multiple logistic regression analysis for acute appendicitis.
RESULTS: Right sided rectal tenderness, present in 309 of those examined, was more common in patients with acute appendicitis (odds ratio 1.34, p less than 0.05). This odds ratio was considerably less than that for other clinical signs--namely, tenderness in the right lower quadrant (odds ratio 5.09), rebound tenderness (3.34), guarding (3.07), and muscular rigidity in the abdomen (5.03). In the logistic regression analysis of patients with acute appendicitis, when allowance was made for the presence or absence of rebound tenderness, rectal tenderness on the right lost its significance. Six patients had masses palpable rectally, of which three were palpable on abdominal examination; the other three patients had acute appendicitis. No other unexpected diagnoses were established, and no useful additional diagnostic information was obtained by routine rectal examination.
CONCLUSION: If patients presenting with pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen are tested for rebound tenderness then rectal examination does not give any further diagnostic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2004144      PMCID: PMC1676168          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  Appendicitis.

Authors:  R B Magee; J M Stowell; R C MacDuffee
Journal:  Pa Med       Date:  1967-06

2.  Decreasing mortality and increasing morbidity from acute appendicitis.

Authors:  K K Kazarian; W J Roeder; W L Mersheimer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardised ratios and rates.

Authors:  J A Morris; M J Gardner
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-07

4.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases.

Authors:  F R Lewis; J W Holcroft; J Boey; E Dunphy
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

5.  Scoring system to aid in diagnoses of appendicitis.

Authors:  I Teicher; B Landa; M Cohen; L S Kabnick; L Wise
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The significance of a "positive" rectal examination in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  J C Bonello; J S Abrams
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Rectal examination and acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A P Dickson; G A MacKinlay
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Observation versus operation for abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant. Roles of the clinical examination and the leukocyte count.

Authors:  R J Nauta; C Magnant
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.565

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Medical myth: a digital rectal examination should be performed on all individuals with possible appendicitis.

Authors:  G S Brewster; M E Herbert
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-09

2.  Rectal examination in patients with abdominal pain.

Authors:  J M Dixon; R A Elton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-25

3.  Rectal examination in patients with abdominal pain.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-13

4.  Artificial neural networks: useful aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S G Prabhudesai; S Gould; S Rekhraj; P P Tekkis; G Glazer; P Ziprin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Abdominal Physical Signs of Inspection and Medical Eponyms.

Authors:  Vaibhav Rastogi; Devina Singh; Halil Tekiner; Fan Ye; Joseph J Mazza; Steven H Yale
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2019-07-15

6.  Use of coughing test to diagnose peritonitis.

Authors:  D H Bennett; L J Tambeur; W B Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-21

7.  Does gender influence emergency department management and outcomes in geriatric abdominal pain?

Authors:  Rebekah L Gardner; Richard Almeida; Judith H Maselli; Andrew Auerbach
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 8.  Does this child have appendicitis?

Authors:  David G Bundy; Julie S Byerley; E Allen Liles; Eliana M Perrin; Jessica Katznelson; Henry E Rice
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Clinical practice and medical research: bridging the divide between the two cultures.

Authors:  P Owen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  The Role of Digital Rectal Examination for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Toshihiko Takada; Hiroki Nishiwaki; Yosuke Yamamoto; Yoshinori Noguchi; Shingo Fukuma; Shin Yamazaki; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.