Literature DB >> 20041273

Improving performance of docking-based virtual screening by structural filtration.

Fedor N Novikov1, Viktor S Stroylov, Oleg V Stroganov, Ghermes G Chilov.   

Abstract

In the current study an innovative method of structural filtration of docked ligand poses is introduced and applied to improve the virtual screening results. The structural filter is defined by a protein-specific set of interactions that are a) structurally conserved in available structures of a particular protein with its bound ligands, and b) that can be viewed as playing the crucial role in protein-ligand binding. The concept was evaluated on a set of 10 diverse proteins, for which the corresponding structural filters were developed and applied to the results of virtual screening obtained with the Lead Finder software. The application of structural filtration resulted in a considerable improvement of the enrichment factor ranging from several folds to hundreds folds depending on the protein target. It appeared that the structural filtration had effectively repaired the deficiencies of the scoring functions that used to overestimate decoy binding, resulting into a considerably lower false positive rate. In addition, the structural filters were also effective in dealing with some deficiencies of the protein structure models that would lead to false negative predictions otherwise. The ability of structural filtration to recover relatively small but specifically bound molecules creates promises for the application of this technology in the fragment-based drug discovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20041273     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-009-0633-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  14 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Flexible docking under pharmacophore type constraints.

Authors:  Sally A Hindle; Matthias Rarey; Christian Buning; Thomas Lengaue
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.

Authors:  Gregory L Warren; C Webster Andrews; Anna-Maria Capelli; Brian Clarke; Judith LaLonde; Millard H Lambert; Mika Lindvall; Neysa Nevins; Simon F Semus; Stefan Senger; Giovanna Tedesco; Ian D Wall; James M Woolven; Catherine E Peishoff; Martha S Head
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands and Proteins (FLAP): theory and application.

Authors:  Massimo Baroni; Gabriele Cruciani; Simone Sciabola; Francesca Perruccio; Jonathan S Mason
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Vadim Cherezov; Daniel M Rosenbaum; Michael A Hanson; Søren G F Rasmussen; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; Hee-Jung Choi; Peter Kuhn; William I Weis; Brian K Kobilka; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Is it possible to increase hit rates in structure-based virtual screening by pharmacophore filtering? An investigation of the advantages and pitfalls of post-filtering.

Authors:  Daniel Muthas; Yogesh A Sabnis; Magnus Lundborg; Anders Karlén
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 2.518

7.  Position specific interaction dependent scoring technique for virtual screening based on weighted protein--ligand interaction fingerprint profiles.

Authors:  Ravi K Nandigam; Sangtae Kim; Juswinder Singh; Claudio Chuaqui
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets.

Authors:  Lu Tan; Hanna Geppert; Mihiret T Sisay; Michael Gütschow; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 9.  Current status and future direction of the molecular modeling industry.

Authors:  Allen B Richon
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.851

10.  Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.

Authors:  Oleg V Stroganov; Fedor N Novikov; Viktor S Stroylov; Val Kulkov; Ghermes G Chilov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hit clustering can improve virtual fragment screening: CDK2 and PARP1 case studies.

Authors:  Alexey A Zeifman; Victor S Stroylov; Fedor N Novikov; Oleg V Stroganov; Alexandra L Zakharenko; Svetlana N Khodyreva; Olga I Lavrik; Ghermes G Chilov
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Lead Finder docking and virtual screening evaluation with Astex and DUD test sets.

Authors:  Fedor N Novikov; Viktor S Stroylov; Alexey A Zeifman; Oleg V Stroganov; Val Kulkov; Ghermes G Chilov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  [The structural protein Gag of the gypsy retrovirus forms virus-like particles in the bacterial cell].

Authors:  B V Semin; L A Ivanova; V I Popenko; Iu V Il'in
Journal:  Mol Biol (Mosk)       Date:  2011 May-Jun

4.  The role of human in the loop: lessons from D3R challenge 4.

Authors:  Oleg V Stroganov; Fedor N Novikov; Michael G Medvedev; Artem O Dmitrienko; Igor Gerasimov; Igor V Svitanko; Ghermes G Chilov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise.

Authors:  David Ryan Koes; Matthew P Baumgartner; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Interaction with specific HSP90 residues as a scoring function: validation in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Authors:  Diogo Santos-Martins
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Qingliang Li; Zhigang Zhou; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Structure-based inhibitors targeting the alpha-helical domain of the Spiroplasma melliferum histone-like HU protein.

Authors:  Yuliya K Agapova; Dmitry A Altukhov; Vladimir I Timofeev; Victor S Stroylov; Vitaly S Mityanov; Dmitry A Korzhenevskiy; Anna V Vlaskina; Eugenia V Smirnova; Eduard V Bocharov; Tatiana V Rakitina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.