Literature DB >> 20040655

Prevalence of type 1 diabetes autoantibodies (GADA, IA2, and IAA) in overweight and obese children.

Valentina M Cambuli1, Michela Incani, Efisio Cossu, Tiziana Congiu, Francesca Scano, Sabrina Pilia, Federica Sentinelli, Claudio Tiberti, M Gisella Cavallo, Sandro Loche, Marco G Baroni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the prevalence of beta-cell autoantibodies in children with excess body weight. The prevalence of type 1 diabetes autoantibodies and its relation with hyperglycemia was analyzed in 686 overweight/obese children and adolescents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All children underwent an oral glucose tolerance test, and anti-GAD, anti-IA2, and anti-IAA autoantibodies were measured. Autoantibody prevalence was evaluated in 107 normal-weight children for comparison.
RESULTS: A single autoantibody was present in 2.18% of overweight/obese subjects and 1.86% normal-weight subjects (P = NS). Postload glycemia was significantly higher in antibody-positive children (133 +/- 69.9 vs. 105.4 +/- 17.7 mg/dl, P < 0.0001) compared with autoantibody-negative subjects. No difference in autoantibody distribution was seen when our cohort was stratified by age, sex, SDS-BMI, pubertal stage, and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).
CONCLUSIONS: The 2.18% prevalence of type 1 diabetes autoantibodies is similar to that reported in nonobese children. This study provided evidence that excess body weight and insulin resistance do not influence autoantibody frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20040655      PMCID: PMC2845034          DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   17.152


Over the last 60 years, a striking increase in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes has been observed consistently in almost all populations. EURODIAB (1) reported an overall increase of 3.2% per annum in Europe between 1989 and 1998. There have also been considerable changes in childhood nutrition, which have resulted in changes in growth. Increased weight, height, and BMI in children have all been associated with a higher risk of type 1 diabetes (2). The so-called “accelerator hypothesis” argues that obesity causing overworked β-cells underlies both type 1 and type 2 diabetes and that these “types” are only distinguished by how the body responds to this growth-induced β-cell stress. This hypothesis therefore attributes the rise in type 1 diabetes to an increase in child obesity (3). A variation of the hypothesis suggests that, once initiated, islet autoimmunity progresses more rapidly in the context of “overload” of the β-cells due to increased insulin resistance (4). Sardinia has one of the highest incidences of type 1 diabetes worldwide, second only to Finland (5). Moreover, Sardinian children and adolescents are experiencing the same increase in obesity as other European populations (6). To date, little is known on the prevalence of autoantibodies against β-cells in children with excess body weight. The aim of our study was to analyze the prevalence of type 1 diabetes autoantibodies in a cohort of Sardinian overweight/obese children and adolescents and to evaluate their distribution in relation to the presence of glucose abnormalities.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 686 overweight/obese Italian children and adolescents were studied, all attending the Pediatric Endocrine Unit for the presence, in all cases, of excess body weight. Exclusion criteria were the presence of endocrine disorders or genetic syndromes, including syndromic obesity. A second group of normal-weight children (n = 107) was collected for antibody prevalence comparison. Clinical characteristics of all 793 subjects are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of overweight/obese and normal-weight children and adolescents

OverweightObeseP (overweight vs. obese)Overweight/obeseNormal weightP (overweight/obese vs. normal weight)
n 217469686107
Age (years)10.6 ± 310.2 ± 3.2NS10.3 ± 3.211.4 ± 3.2<0.01
Sex (F/M) (n)124/93236/233NS360/32649/58NS
Prepubertal/pubertal (n)150/67329/240NS479/20768/39NS
BMI (kg/m2)25.1 ± 2.328.9 ± 4<0.000127.7 ± 4.517.9 ± 2.7<0.0001
SDS-BMI1.9 ± 0.73.2 ± 1.2<0.00012.8 ± 1.2−0.46 ± 0.8<0.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)104.19 ± 13.4107.53 ± 15.5<0.017106.4 ± 14.9105 ± 10.6NS
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)61.35 ± 7.962.38 ± 9.4NS62 ± 961.1 ± 5.4NS
Glycemia 0′ (mg/dl)90.1 ± 7.889.4 ± 7.6NS89.6 ± 7.788.4 ± 8.4NS
Insulin (μU/ml)15.7 ± 7.216.9 ± 9.7NS16.6 ± 911.7 ± 6<0.0001
HOMA-IR3.5 ± 1.63.7 ± 2.3NS3.7 ± 22.6 ± 1.4<0.0001
Total cholesterol (mg/dl)168 ± 34.1165.9 ± 32.2NS166.6 ± 32.8165 ± 26.3NS
HDL (mg/dl)51.4 ± 11.849.8 ± 11NS50.3 ± 11.359.4 ± 12.2<0.0001
LDL (mg/dl)105.1 ± 28.9103.3 ± 28.2NS103.9 ± 28.496.4 ± 24<0.02
Triglycerides (mg/dl)57.2 ± 39.260.8 ± 32.8NS59.7 ± 3545.7 ± 29.5<0.0001
Autoantibody positive [n (%)]7 (3.22)8 (1.70)NS15 (2.18)2 (1.86)NS
Anti-GAD positive [n (%)]6 (2.76)7 (1.49)NS13 (1.89)2 (1.86)NS
Anti-IA2 positive [n (%)]1 (0.46)5 (1.06)NS6 (0.87)2 (1.86)NS
Anti-IAA positive [n (%)]2 (0.92)1 (0.21)NS3 (0.43)0NS

Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Overweight, obesity, and SDS-BMI were defined according to Italian growth charts in people aged 2–20 years (12). 1 SD of BMI defines overweight, 2 SD of BMI defines obesity. Pubertal developmental stages were determined according to Tanner. Differences between variables were evaluated by two-tailed Student's t test or Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 or Fischer's exact tests.

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of overweight/obese and normal-weight children and adolescents Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Overweight, obesity, and SDS-BMI were defined according to Italian growth charts in people aged 2–20 years (12). 1 SD of BMI defines overweight, 2 SD of BMI defines obesity. Pubertal developmental stages were determined according to Tanner. Differences between variables were evaluated by two-tailed Student's t test or Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 or Fischer's exact tests.

Clinical and metabolic parameters

All overweight/obese subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The OGTT was performed according to clinical recommendations for children (1.75 g/kg body wt, up to 75 g). Plasma glucose and insulin were measured at 0 and 120 min. Subjects were classified according to American Diabetes Association criteria in subjects with normal glucose tolerance, with impaired fasting glycemia (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or diabetes. Impaired glucose regulation (IGR) defined the presence of any category of glucose abnormality (IFG, IGT, and diabetes). Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes was made in the presence of diabetic hyperglycemia and at least one β-cell autoantibody. In all 793 children, anti-GAD, anti-IA2, and anti-IAA autoantibodies (GAD-Ab125I-Radioassay, IA2-Ab125I-Radioassay, and IAA-Ab125I-Radioassay) were assessed (all from DLD Diagnostika, Germany). The upper normal limit for anti-GAD and anti-IA2 is ≤1 unit/ml and for anti-IAA is ≤0.4 units/ml. Anti-GAD assay has an intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 3.6% and an interassay CV between 4.9 and 7.0%. Anti-IA2 assay has intra- and interassay CVs between 2.5 and 2.8% and between 3.3 and 5.3%, respectively. Anti-IAA assay has intra- and interassay CVs between 3.0 and 5.8% and 4.2 and 6.7%, respectively. Our laboratory achieved 76% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity for anti-GAD and 64% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity for anti-IA2 at the latest Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program (DASP2009). Anti-IAA results were confirmed by a second method based on a competitive fluid-phase radioimmunoassay (7).

RESULTS

Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies

In the 686 overweight/obese children, a single autoantibody (either anti-GAD, anti-IA2, or anti-IAA) was present in 15 subjects (2.18%). Anti-GADs were detectable in 13 of 686 (1.89%) children, anti-IA2s were present in 6 of 686 (0.87%) children, and anti-IAAs were found in 3 of 686 (0.43%) children. Two antibodies were found together in five (0.7%) subjects. All three autoantibodies were found in only one subject. In the 107 normal-weight children, anti-GAD and anti-IA2 were found together in two subjects (1.86%, P = NS vs. overweight/obese children). No difference in autoantibody distribution was observed when our cohort was stratified by age, sex, SDS-BMI, pubertal stage, and the homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance (HOMA- IR) (data not shown).

IGR and autoantibodies in overweight/obese children

Overall prevalence of IGR in our cohort of overweight/obese children was 11.37% (78/686). The frequency of IFG was 8.16% (56/686), IGT 3.2% (22/686), and diabetes 0.6% (4/686). When divided on the basis of glucose regulation, the presence of autoimmunity was three times more prevalent in children with IGR (5.12%) than in children with normal glucose tolerance (1.80%). The prevalence of glucose abnormalities in antibody-positive subjects was 27%, compared with 11% in antibody-negative children. In the whole group, anti-IAA titers correlated with postload glycemia (P < 0.03), which was significantly higher in antibody-positive children (133 ± 69.9 vs. 105.4 ± 17.7 mg/dl; P < 0.0001) when compared with antibody-negative subjects. Antibodies titers were not correlated to fasting glucose (93.5 ± 16.2 vs. 89.6 ± 7.4; P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, we found that the prevalence of autoantibodies in overweight/obese children was similar (2.18%) to that found in our cohort of normal-weight–matched subjects (1.86%, P = NS), as well as to that reported in the general population of schoolchildren (8,9). When our cohort was stratified in subjects with normal and impaired glucose regulation, prevalence of autoantibodies was higher in individuals with IGR (5.12%). This prevalence is similar to that reported in nonobese hyperglycemic children (10). We also found that antibody-positive subjects had a significantly higher 2-h glycemia. Our results are in line with those recently demonstrated in the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1) study (11), where the majority of subjects diagnosed with type 1 diabetes had impaired post-OGTT glucose levels, thus suggesting that OGTT in antibody-positive subjects may help to prevent acute-onset disease. With regards to this point, the prevalence of glucose abnormalities in our antibody-positive subjects was nearly 30%, and in all cases, IGR was diagnosed by the 2-h value. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that excess body weight and insulin resistance do not influence the frequencies of autoantibodies as postulated by the accelerator hypothesis, which is therefore not supported by our data. It also shows that an obese child can be at risk for type 1 diabetes as much as a normal-weight child. However, the hypothesis of the “overload” of β-cells as a result of increased insulin demands linked to obesity warrants further study.
  11 in total

1.  Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989-2003 and predicted new cases 2005-20: a multicentre prospective registration study.

Authors:  Christopher C Patterson; Gisela G Dahlquist; Eva Gyürüs; Anders Green; Gyula Soltész
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  [IDDM-Sardinia Project: a study model on the etiopathogenesis of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and other autoimmune pathologies. Gruppi di studio IDDM-Sardegna].

Authors:  M Locatelli; M Songini; G F Bottazzo
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.663

3.  The Karlsburg type 1 diabetes risk study of a normal schoolchild population: association of beta-cell autoantibodies and human leukocyte antigen-DQB1 alleles in antibody-positive individuals.

Authors:  Michael Schlosser; Martina Strebelow; Ralf Wassmuth; Marie-Luise Arnold; Isabel Breunig; Ilona Rjasanowski; Brigitte Ziegler; Manfred Ziegler
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Italian cross-sectional growth charts for height, weight and BMI (2 to 20 yr).

Authors:  E Cacciari; S Milani; A Balsamo; E Spada; G Bona; L Cavallo; F Cerutti; L Gargantini; N Greggio; G Tonini; A Cicognani
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Testing the accelerator hypothesis: body size, beta-cell function, and age at onset of type 1 (autoimmune) diabetes.

Authors:  Dana Dabelea; Ralph B D'Agostino; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; David J Pettitt; Giuseppina Imperatore; Larry M Dolan; Catherine Pihoker; Teresa A Hillier; Santica M Marcovina; Barbara Linder; Andrea M Ruggiero; Richard F Hamman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Obesity, increased linear growth, and risk of type 1 diabetes in children.

Authors:  E Hyppönen; S M Virtanen; M G Kenward; M Knip; H K Akerblom
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Type 1 diabetes among sardinian children is increasing: the Sardinian diabetes register for children aged 0-14 years (1989-1999).

Authors:  Anna Casu; Cristiana Pascutto; Luisa Bernardinelli; Marco Songini
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Competitive insulin autoantibody assay. Prospective evaluation of subjects at high risk for development of type I diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  P Vardi; S A Dib; M Tuttleman; J E Connelly; M Grinbergs; A Radizabeh; W J Riley; N K Maclaren; G S Eisenbarth; J S Soeldner
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 9.  The accelerator hypothesis: a review of the evidence for insulin resistance as the basis for type I as well as type II diabetes.

Authors:  T J Wilkin
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Diabetic subjects diagnosed through the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1) are often asymptomatic with normal A1C at diabetes onset.

Authors:  Taylor M Triolo; H Peter Chase; Jennifer M Barker
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 17.152

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Type 2 diabetes in childhood: clinical characteristics and role of β-cell autoimmunity.

Authors:  Angela Badaru; Catherine Pihoker
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  AIM associated with the IgM pentamer: attackers on stand-by at aircraft carrier.

Authors:  Toru Miyazaki; Tomoko Yamazaki; Ryoichi Sugisawa; M Eric Gershwin; Satoko Arai
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 11.530

3.  Presence of diabetes-specific autoimmunity in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) predicts impaired glucose regulation at follow-up.

Authors:  E Cossu; M Incani; M G Pani; G Gattu; C Serafini; A Strazzera; L Bertoccini; F A Cimini; I Barchetta; M G Cavallo; M G Baroni
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Obesity, autoimmunity, and double diabetes in youth.

Authors:  Paolo Pozzilli; Chiara Guglielmi; Sonia Caprio; Raffaella Buzzetti
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Latent autoimmune diabetes of adults: From oral hypoglycemic agents to early insulin.

Authors:  Resham R Poudel
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-03

6.  Successful management of insulin allergy and autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 4 with desensitization therapy and glucocorticoid treatment: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Joselyn Rojas; Marjorie Villalobos; María Sofía Martínez; Mervin Chávez-Castillo; Wheeler Torres; José Carlos Mejías; Edgar Miquilena; Valmore Bermúdez
Journal:  Case Reports Immunol       Date:  2014-11-19

7.  Nardilysin-dependent proteolysis of cell-associated VTCN1 (B7-H4) marks type 1 diabetes development.

Authors:  Ilian A Radichev; Lilia V Maneva-Radicheva; Christina Amatya; Camille Parker; Jacob Ellefson; Clive Wasserfall; Mark Atkinson; Paul Burn; Alexei Y Savinov
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 8.  The Influence of Different Types of Diabetes on Vascular Complications.

Authors:  Jiahua Wei; Jiaxing Tian; Cheng Tang; Xinyi Fang; Runyu Miao; Haoran Wu; Xiuge Wang; Xiaolin Tong
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.011

Review 9.  Impacts of the apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage (AIM) on obesity-associated inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Satoko Arai; Toru Miyazaki
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 9.623

10.  Stabilization and augmentation of circulating AIM in mice by synthesized IgM-Fc.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kai; Tomoko Yamazaki; Satoko Arai; Toru Miyazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.