Literature DB >> 20040333

Neuropathological biomarker candidates in brain tumors: key issues for translational efficiency.

J A Hainfellner1, H Heinzl.   

Abstract

Brain tumors comprise a large spectrum of rare malignancies in children and adults that are often associated with severe neurological symptoms and fatal outcome. Neuropathological tumor typing provides both prognostic and predictive tissue information which is the basis for optimal postoperative patient management and therapy. Molecular biomarkers may extend and refine prognostic and predictive information in a brain tumor case, providing more individualized and optimized treatment options. In the recent past a few neuropathological brain tumor biomarkers have translated smoothly into clinical use whereas many candidates show protracted translation. We investigated the causes of protracted translation of candidate brain tumor biomarkers. Considering the research environment from personal, social and systemic perspectives we identified eight determinants of translational success: methodology, funding, statistics, organization, phases of research, cooperation, self-reflection, and scientific progeny. Smoothly translating biomarkers are associated with low degrees of translational complexity whereas biomarkers with protracted translation are associated with high degrees. Key issues for translational efficiency of neuropathological brain tumor biomarker research seem to be related to (i) the strict orientation to the mission of medical research, that is the improval of medical practice as primordial purpose of research, (ii) definition of research priorities according to clinical needs, and (iii) absorption of translational complexities by means of operatively beneficial standards. To this end, concrete actions should comprise adequate scientific education of young investigators, and shaping of integrative diagnostics and therapy research both on the local level and the level of influential international brain tumor research platforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20040333     DOI: 10.5414/npp29041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropathol        ISSN: 0722-5091            Impact factor:   1.368


  4 in total

Review 1.  Molecular diagnostics: techniques and recommendations for 1p/19q assessment.

Authors:  Adelheid Woehrer; Johannes A Hainfellner
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015-11-06

2.  Clinical Neuropathology Practice News 4-2012: levels of evidence for brain tumor biomarkers.

Authors:  Anna Sophie Berghoff; Harald Stefanits; Harald Heinzl; Matthias Preusser
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.368

3.  Brain Tumor Epidemiology - A Hub within Multidisciplinary Neuro-oncology. Report on the 15th Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium (BTEC) Annual Meeting, Vienna, 2014.

Authors:  Adelheid Woehrer; Ching C Lau; Daniela Prayer; Luc Bauchet; Myrna Rosenfeld; David Capper; Paul G Fisher; Marcel Kool; Martin Müller; Johan M Kros; Carol Kruchko; Joseph Wiemels; Margaret Wrensch; Heather E Danysh; Sonia Zouaoui; Julia E Heck; Kimberly J Johnson; Xiaoyang Qi; Brian P O'Neill; Samina Afzal; Michael E Scheurer; Matthew N Bainbridge; Darryl Nousome; El Mustapha Bahassi; Johannes A Hainfellner; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.368

4.  Clinical neuropathology practice guide 3-2013: levels of evidence and clinical utility of prognostic and predictive candidate brain tumor biomarkers.

Authors:  Anna S Berghoff; Harald Stefanits; Adelheid Woehrer; Harald Heinzl; Matthias Preusser; Johannes A Hainfellner
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.368

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.