Literature DB >> 20040193

[Comparison of nested-PCR with blood smear examination in detection of Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma platys in dogs].

Carlos A N Ramos1, Rafael A N Ramos, Flábio R Araújo, Daniel S Guedes, Ingrid I F Souza, Tatiana M Ono, Anahi S Vieira, Danillo S Pimentel, Eduardo O Rosas, Maria A G Faustino, Leucio C Alves.   

Abstract

The clinical signs of Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma platys infection are similar, and the diagnosis of these pathogens made by stained blood smears is poor due sensibility and specificity. On the other hand, the molecular diagnosis is highly sensitive and specific and nested-PCR have been optimized for accurate diagnosis these pathogens in dogs. At the veterinary teaching hospital, whole-blood samples with EDTA were obtained from 100 dogs and smears were made from blood samples for evaluation for intracellular parasites. For each sample, DNA was extracted and submitted to nPCR analysis for detection of E. canis and A. platys. The results of stained blood smears showed 9% of the animals were positive for E. canis and 21% for A. platys. Regarding of nPCR analysis, 57 and 55% of dogs were positive for E. canis and A. platys respectively. As compared to a nested PCR, the stained blood smears revealed false-negative results for both E. canis and A. platys. The results indicate that the nPCR is highly sensitive and specific for detection of both pathogens and the molecular diagnosis could be more useful at veterinary hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20040193     DOI: 10.4322/rbpv.018e1011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Parasitol Vet        ISSN: 0103-846X


  3 in total

1.  An assessment of whole blood and fractions by nested PCR as a DNA source for diagnosing canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.

Authors:  Tereza Emmanuelle de Farias Rotondano; Alzira Maria Paiva de Almeida; Elane Maria Camboim Lustosa; Aline Antas Cordeiro; Expedito Kennedy Alves Camboim; Sérgio Santos de Azevedo; Paulo Paes de Andrade; Marcia Almeida de Melo
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-08-22

2.  Retrospective analyses of dogs found serologically positive for Ehrlichia canis in Cebu, Philippines from 2003 to 2014.

Authors:  Adrian P Ybañez; Rochelle Haidee D Ybañez; Rex R Villavelez; Honey Pearl F Malingin; Dana Natasha M Barrameda; Sharmaine V Naquila; Shiella Mae B Olimpos
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-01-13

3.  Demonstrating the presence of Ehrlichia canis DNA from different tissues of dogs with suspected subclinical ehrlichiosis.

Authors:  Carlos A Rodríguez-Alarcón; Diana M Beristain-Ruiz; Angélica Olivares-Muñoz; Andrés Quezada-Casasola; Federico Pérez-Casio; Jesús A Álvarez-Martínez; Jane Tapia-Alanís; José J Lira-Amaya; Ramón Rivera-Barreno; Orlando S Cera-Hurtado; José A Ibancovichi-Camarillo; Luis Soon-Gómez; Jaime R Adame-Gallegos; Julio V Figueroa-Millán
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.876

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.