Literature DB >> 20039833

Time-course for recovery of renal function after unilateral (single-tract) percutaneous access in the pig.

Rajash K Handa1, Lynn R Willis, Bret A Connors, Sujuan Gao, Andrew P Evan, Samuel C Kim, William W Tinmouth, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The immediate (1-5 hours) response to percutaneous renal access (PERC) in pigs is vasoconstriction in the treated kidney. The present study determined the longer-term (72 hours) consequences of this surgical procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult female pigs were anesthetized, and bilateral glomerular filtration rate (GFR), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), urine flow rate, and sodium excretion rate were measured before and 1 hour after sham PERC or unilateral, single-tract PERC using a balloon dilator system. Animals were allowed to regain consciousness and were then anesthetized 72 hours later for final measurements of bilateral renal hemodynamic and excretory function together with renal para-aminohippuric acid (PAH) extraction (a measure of tubular organic anion transport efficiency).
RESULTS: Bilateral renal hemodynamics were unchanged in the sham-PERC-treated pigs over the 72-hour observation period. In contrast, both GFR and ERPF were reduced by approximately 55% in the PERC-treated kidney within 1 hour of access, and returned to pre-PERC levels within 72 hours. Renal hemodynamics were not significantly altered in the opposite, untreated kidney of the PERC-treated pigs. Renal PAH extraction was decreased in PERC-treated kidneys at 72 hours post-PERC. Both sham-PERC-treated and PERC-treated animals showed similar falls in urine flow rate and sodium excretion rate immediately after treatment and at 72 hours after PERC.
CONCLUSIONS: Renal vasoconstriction characterized the acute response of the treated kidney to unilateral PERC, whereas impaired tubular function (reduced PAH extraction) with near-normal GFR and ERPF characterizes the later (72 hours) response to PERC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20039833     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  6 in total

1.  Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review.

Authors:  Kyle Wood; Tristan Keys; Patrick Mufarrij; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

2.  Baseline chronic kidney disease does not predict long-term renal functional decline after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Kara L Watts; Abhishek Srivastava; Wilson Lin; Daniel Schoenfeld; Matthew Abramowitz; Joshua M Stern
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Effect of urinary stone disease and its treatment on renal function.

Authors:  Ozden Ender; Necmettin Mercimek Mehmet
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-06

4.  Impacts of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on the estimated glomerular filtration rate during the first few days after surgery.

Authors:  Akbar Nouralizadeh; Mehrdad Mohammadi Sichani; Amir H Kashi
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-09-18

5.  Percutaneous Renal Access: Surgical Factors Involved in the Acute Reduction of Renal Function.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Cynthia D Johnson; Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman; Ziyue Liu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Postoperative Renal Outcomes of Patients Receiving Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Pyelolithotomy: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Fang-Ting Chen; Fu-Chao Liu; Chih-Wen Cheng; Jr-Rung Lin; Huang-Ping Yu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.