INTRODUCTION: More than a third of children with ependymoma experience relapse, and despite multimodal treatment, less than 25% of them can then achieve long-term survival. Prognostic factors for patients who relapse have not been extensively analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 82 patients from four pediatric oncology European institutions in order to identify prognostic factors and influence of treatment modalities in relapsed ependymoma. RESULTS: First relapse occurred after a median of 19 months (1 month-16 years). Five-year progression-free survival and overall survival of the cohort were 17% and 27.6%, respectively. Survival was statistically significantly higher for patients achieving gross total resection. No survival benefit was seen for children receiving chemotherapy whereas patients who were amenable to some form of re-irradiation had a better outcome. Objective responses were found in more than 25% of patients receiving oral etoposide, temozolomide, or vincristine/etoposide/cyclophosphamide regimens. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with mixed relapses, no surgery at relapse, and receiving chemotherapy did worse (hazard ratio = 3.6, 3.3, and 1.7, respectively, all p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Relapsed ependymoma carries a very poor prognosis with an indolent chronic course, leading to death in approximately 90% of the patients. Complete surgical resection whenever possible should be encouraged. Radiation therapy of the relapsed lesions can provide some minor benefit whereas chemotherapy despite the occasional responses provides no benefit in the final outcome which is dismal. Efforts have to be orchestrated internationally to enroll these patients on clinical trials using biology-based therapies.
INTRODUCTION: More than a third of children with ependymoma experience relapse, and despite multimodal treatment, less than 25% of them can then achieve long-term survival. Prognostic factors for patients who relapse have not been extensively analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 82 patients from four pediatric oncology European institutions in order to identify prognostic factors and influence of treatment modalities in relapsed ependymoma. RESULTS: First relapse occurred after a median of 19 months (1 month-16 years). Five-year progression-free survival and overall survival of the cohort were 17% and 27.6%, respectively. Survival was statistically significantly higher for patients achieving gross total resection. No survival benefit was seen for children receiving chemotherapy whereas patients who were amenable to some form of re-irradiation had a better outcome. Objective responses were found in more than 25% of patients receiving oral etoposide, temozolomide, or vincristine/etoposide/cyclophosphamide regimens. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with mixed relapses, no surgery at relapse, and receiving chemotherapy did worse (hazard ratio = 3.6, 3.3, and 1.7, respectively, all p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Relapsed ependymoma carries a very poor prognosis with an indolent chronic course, leading to death in approximately 90% of the patients. Complete surgical resection whenever possible should be encouraged. Radiation therapy of the relapsed lesions can provide some minor benefit whereas chemotherapy despite the occasional responses provides no benefit in the final outcome which is dismal. Efforts have to be orchestrated internationally to enroll these patients on clinical trials using biology-based therapies.
Authors: J Grill; M C Le Deley; D Gambarelli; M A Raquin; D Couanet; A Pierre-Kahn; J L Habrand; F Doz; D Frappaz; J C Gentet; C Edan; P Chastagner; C Kalifa Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P K Duffner; J P Krischer; R A Sanford; M E Horowitz; P C Burger; M E Cohen; H S Friedman; L E Kun Journal: Pediatr Neurosurg Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 1.162
Authors: Richard G Grundy; Sophie A Wilne; Claire L Weston; Kath Robinson; Linda S Lashford; James Ironside; Tim Cox; W Kling Chong; Richard H A Campbell; Cliff C Bailey; Rao Gattamaneni; Sue Picton; Nicky Thorpe; Conor Mallucci; Martin W English; Jonathan A G Punt; David A Walker; David W Ellison; David Machin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Mark W Kieran; Liliana Goumnerova; Peter Manley; Susan N Chi; Karen J Marcus; Andrea G Manzanera; Maria Lucia Silva Polanco; Brian W Guzik; Estuardo Aguilar-Cordova; C Marcela Diaz-Montero; Arthur J DiPatri; Tadanori Tomita; Rishi Lulla; Lianne Greenspan; Laura K Aguilar; Stewart Goldman Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: John Glod; Gilbert J Rahme; Harpreet Kaur; Eric H Raabe; Eugene I Hwang; Mark A Israel Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Brian De; Yasmin Khakoo; Mark M Souweidane; Ira J Dunkel; Suchit H Patel; Stephen W Gilheeney; Kevin C De Braganca; Matthias A Karajannis; Suzanne L Wolden Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mariko DeWire; Maryam Fouladi; David C Turner; Cynthia Wetmore; Cynthia Hawkins; Carmen Jacobs; Ying Yuan; Diane Liu; Stewart Goldman; Paul Fisher; Michael Rytting; Eric Bouffet; Yasmin Khakoo; Eugene I Hwang; Nicholas Foreman; Clinton F Stewart; Mark R Gilbert; Richard Gilbertson; Amar Gajjar Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Amar Gajjar; Roger J Packer; N K Foreman; Kenneth Cohen; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Thomas E Merchant Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Derek S Tsang; Louise Murray; Vijay Ramaswamy; Michal Zapotocky; Uri Tabori; Ute Bartels; Annie Huang; Peter B Dirks; Michael D Taylor; Cynthia Hawkins; Eric Bouffet; Normand Laperriere Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 12.300