Literature DB >> 20038788

Aberrant immunophenotype of blasts in myelodysplastic syndromes is a clinically relevant biomarker in predicting response to growth factor treatment.

Theresia M Westers1, Canan Alhan, Martine E D Chamuleau, Maurice J D L van der Vorst, Corien Eeltink, Gert J Ossenkoppele, Arjan A van de Loosdrecht.   

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of clonal disorders of the bone marrow characterized by peripheral cytopenias. Standard treatment in low- and intermediate-I-risk MDS is supportive therapy consisting of regular transfusions and growth factors, that is, erythropoietin (Epo) and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Because flow cytometric analysis of MDS bone marrow samples can identify clinically relevant subgroups regarding transfusion dependency and disease progression, we addressed the question whether flow cytometry (FCM) was instrumental in predicting response. In 46 patients with low- and intermediate-I-risk MDS that were treated with Epo/G-CSF, low Epo level and low transfusion need were associated with response to Epo/G-CSF. Interestingly, aberrant phenotype of myeloblasts identified nonresponders among patients with the greatest response probability according to the predictive model of Hellström-Lindberg et al. Moreover, aberrant FCM of myeloblasts acted as a significant biomarker for treatment failure in multivariate analysis. A new predictive model based on the basis FCM combined with previously validated Epo levels is proposed defining 3 subgroups with 94%, 17%, and 11% response probability. In conclusion, FCM may add significantly to well-known predictive parameters in selecting MDS patients eligible for Epo/G-CSF treatment. This is of relevance regarding prevention of treatment failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20038788     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-239749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  21 in total

1.  Multicenter validation of a reproducible flow cytometric score for the diagnosis of low-grade myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a European LeukemiaNET study.

Authors:  Matteo G Della Porta; Cristina Picone; Cristiana Pascutto; Luca Malcovati; Hideto Tamura; Hiroshi Handa; Magdalena Czader; Sylvie Freeman; Paresh Vyas; Anna Porwit; Leonie Saft; Theresia M Westers; Canan Alhan; Claudia Cali; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Kiyoyuki Ogata
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Personalized medicine in myelodysplastic syndromes: wishful thinking or already clinical reality?

Authors:  Uwe Platzbecker; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Resuscitating a dying marrow: the role of hematopoietic growth factors.

Authors:  Aakriti Pandita; Sudipto Mukherjee
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

4.  Are somatic mutations predictive of response to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes?

Authors:  Olivier Kosmider; Marie Passet; Valeria Santini; Uwe Platzbecker; Valérie Andrieu; Gina Zini; Odile Beyne-Rauzy; Agnès Guerci; Erico Masala; Enrico Balleari; Ekaterina Bulycheva; François Dreyfus; Pierre Fenaux; Michaela Fontenay; Sophie Park
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Is There a Role for Flow Cytometry in the Evaluation of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes?

Authors:  Anna Porwit
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  Bone marrow immunophenotyping by flow cytometry in refractory cytopenia of childhood.

Authors:  Anna M Aalbers; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Irith Baumann; Michael Dworzak; Henrik Hasle; Franco Locatelli; Barbara De Moerloose; Markus Schmugge; Ester Mejstrikova; Michaela Nováková; Marco Zecca; C Michel Zwaan; Jeroen G Te Marvelde; Anton W Langerak; Jacques J M van Dongen; Rob Pieters; Charlotte M Niemeyer; Vincent H J van der Velden
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  p-ERK1/2 is a predictive factor of response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in low/int-1 myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Emilie Frisan; Patrycja Pawlikowska; Cecile Pierre-Eugène; Vivian Viallon; Laure Gibault; Sophie Park; Patrick Mayeux; François Dreyfus; Françoise Porteu; Michaëla Fontenay
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  MDS prognostic scoring systems – past, present, and future.

Authors:  Brian A Jonas; Peter L Greenberg
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Revisiting guidelines for integration of flow cytometry results in the WHO classification of myelodysplastic syndromes-proposal from the International/European LeukemiaNet Working Group for Flow Cytometry in MDS.

Authors:  A Porwit; A A van de Loosdrecht; P Bettelheim; L Eidenschink Brodersen; K Burbury; E Cremers; M G Della Porta; R Ireland; U Johansson; S Matarraz; K Ogata; A Orfao; F Preijers; K Psarra; D Subirá; P Valent; V H J van der Velden; D Wells; T M Westers; W Kern; M C Béné
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  The myelodysplastic syndromes flow cytometric score: a three-parameter prognostic flow cytometric scoring system.

Authors:  C Alhan; T M Westers; E M P Cremers; C Cali; B I Witte; G J Ossenkoppele; A A van de Loosdrecht
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.