Literature DB >> 20038707

Methanotrophic communities in Brazilian ferralsols from naturally forested, afforested, and agricultural sites.

Nicole Dörr1, Bruno Glaser, Steffen Kolb.   

Abstract

Conversion of forests to farmland permanently lowers atmospheric methane consumption due to unresolved reasons. Alphaproteobacterial methanotrophs were predominant in forested soils and gammaproteobacterial species were predominant in farmland soils of subtropical ferralsols in Brazil. The capability of atmospheric methane consumption was obliterated in farmland soils, suggesting a shift from oligotrophic to copiotrophic species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20038707      PMCID: PMC2820952          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02282-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  17 in total

1.  Application of a newly developed ARB software-integrated tool for in silico terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis reveals the dominance of a novel pmoA cluster in a forest soil.

Authors:  Peter Ricke; Steffen Kolb; Gesche Braker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Diversity of methanotrophic bacteria in tropical upland soils under different land uses.

Authors:  Claudia Knief; Supika Vanitchung; Narumon W Harvey; Ralf Conrad; Peter F Dunfield; Amnat Chidthaisong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Response and adaptation of different methanotrophic bacteria to low methane mixing ratios.

Authors:  Claudia Knief; Peter F Dunfield
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related.

Authors:  A J Holmes; A Costello; M E Lidstrom; J C Murrell
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 5.  Methanotrophic bacteria.

Authors:  R S Hanson; T E Hanson
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-06

6.  Effect of afforestation and reforestation of pastures on the activity and population dynamics of methanotrophic bacteria.

Authors:  Brajesh K Singh; Kevin R Tate; Gokul Kolipaka; Carolyn B Hedley; Catriona A Macdonald; Peter Millard; J Colin Murrell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Acute impact of agriculture on high-affinity methanotrophic bacterial populations.

Authors:  P J Maxfield; E R C Hornibrook; R P Evershed
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  The quest for atmospheric methane oxidizers in forest soils.

Authors:  Steffen Kolb
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.541

9.  Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2.

Authors:  Mohamed Baani; Werner Liesack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Differential effects of nitrogenous fertilizers on methane-consuming microbes in rice field and forest soils.

Authors:  Santosh R Mohanty; Paul L E Bodelier; Virgilio Floris; Ralf Conrad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  12 in total

1.  Agriculture's impact on microbial diversity and associated fluxes of carbon dioxide and methane.

Authors:  Uri Y Levine; Tracy K Teal; G Philip Robertson; Thomas M Schmidt
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Evidence of microbial regulation of biogeochemical cycles from a study on methane flux and land use change.

Authors:  Loïc Nazaries; Yao Pan; Levente Bodrossy; Elizabeth M Baggs; Peter Millard; J Colin Murrell; Brajesh K Singh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Changes in methane oxidation activity and methanotrophic community composition in saline alkaline soils.

Authors:  Nancy Serrano-Silva; César Valenzuela-Encinas; Rodolfo Marsch; Luc Dendooven; Rocio J Alcántara-Hernández
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Linking activity, composition and seasonal dynamics of atmospheric methane oxidizers in a meadow soil.

Authors:  Pravin Malla Shrestha; Claudia Kammann; Katharina Lenhart; Bomba Dam; Werner Liesack
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Response of methanotrophic communities to afforestation and reforestation in New Zealand.

Authors:  Loïc Nazaries; Kevin R Tate; Des J Ross; Jagrati Singh; John Dando; Surinder Saggar; Elizabeth M Baggs; Peter Millard; J Colin Murrell; Brajesh K Singh
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Response of free-living nitrogen-fixing microorganisms to land use change in the Amazon rainforest.

Authors:  Babur S Mirza; Chotima Potisap; Klaus Nüsslein; Brendan J M Bohannan; Jorge L M Rodrigues
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Activity and abundance of methane-oxidizing bacteria in secondary forest and manioc plantations of Amazonian Dark Earth and their adjacent soils.

Authors:  Amanda B Lima; Aleksander W Muniz; Marc G Dumont
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Diversity and Habitat Preferences of Cultivated and Uncultivated Aerobic Methanotrophic Bacteria Evaluated Based on pmoA as Molecular Marker.

Authors:  Claudia Knief
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Prerequisites for amplicon pyrosequencing of microbial methanol utilizers in the environment.

Authors:  Steffen Kolb; Astrid Stacheter
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Degraded Land Restoration in Reinstating CH4 Sink.

Authors:  Jay Shankar Singh; Vijai K Gupta
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.