PURPOSE: To compare mRNA levels in cancer cells and protein levels in cancerous tissue in order to evaluate the expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials were resected specimens of primary colorectal cancer (n=88) and synchronous liver metastasis (n=15). The expression of DPD mRNA in cancer cells was quantified by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using cancer cells obtained by micro-dissection of paraffin-embedded specimens (Danenberg tumor profiling method). The protein level of DPD was determined by enzyme -linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: There was no relationship between the level of DPD mRNA and the level of DPD protein in primary colorectal cancers and liver metastases. The level of DPD protein tended to be higher in liver metastases than in primary lesions (p=0.08) without a significant relationship between the two values. There was no relationship between primary colorectal lesions and liver metastases in terms of the expression of DPD mRNA. The efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU or UFT)/Leucovorin did not correlate with the expression level of DPD mRNA or DPD protein of primary lesions (n=18). CONCLUSIONS: We should note the discrepancy of results between the two different methods and the lack of a relationship between the levels of DPD expression in primary lesions and liver metastases, when considering the efficacy of 5-FU-based regimens according to the DPD expression level in primary colorectal cancers.
PURPOSE: To compare mRNA levels in cancer cells and protein levels in cancerous tissue in order to evaluate the expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The materials were resected specimens of primary colorectal cancer (n=88) and synchronous liver metastasis (n=15). The expression of DPD mRNA in cancer cells was quantified by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using cancer cells obtained by micro-dissection of paraffin-embedded specimens (Danenberg tumor profiling method). The protein level of DPD was determined by enzyme -linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: There was no relationship between the level of DPD mRNA and the level of DPD protein in primary colorectal cancers and liver metastases. The level of DPD protein tended to be higher in liver metastases than in primary lesions (p=0.08) without a significant relationship between the two values. There was no relationship between primary colorectal lesions and liver metastases in terms of the expression of DPD mRNA. The efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU or UFT)/Leucovorin did not correlate with the expression level of DPD mRNA or DPD protein of primary lesions (n=18). CONCLUSIONS: We should note the discrepancy of results between the two different methods and the lack of a relationship between the levels of DPD expression in primary lesions and liver metastases, when considering the efficacy of 5-FU-based regimens according to the DPD expression level in primary colorectal cancers.