Literature DB >> 20036668

Similarity in ectoparasite faunas of Palaearctic rodents as a function of host phylogenetic, geographic or environmental distances: which matters the most?

Boris R Krasnov1, David Mouillot, Georgy I Shenbrot, Irina S Khokhlova, Maxim V Vinarski, Natalia P Korallo-Vinarskaya, Robert Poulin.   

Abstract

Different host species harbour parasite faunas that are anywhere from very similar to very different in species composition. A priori, the similarity in the parasite faunas of any two host species should decrease with increases in either the phylogenetic distance, the distinctness of the environments occupied or the geographical distance between these hosts. We tested these predictions using extensive data on the faunas of fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) and gamasid mites (Acari: Parasitiformes) parasitic on rodents across the Palaearctic. For each pair of host species, we computed the similarity in parasite faunas based on both species composition as well as the phylogenetic and/or taxonomic distinctness of parasite species. Phylogenetic distances between hosts were based on patristic distances through a rodent phylogeny, geographic distances were computed from geographic range data, and environmental dissimilarity was measured from the average climatic and vegetation scores of each host range. Using multiple regressions on distance matrices to assess the separate explanatory power of each of the three dependent variables, environmental dissimilarity between the ranges of host species emerged as the best predictor of dissimilarity between parasite faunas, especially for fleas; in the case of mites, phylogenetic distance between host species was also important. A closer look at the data indicates that the flea and mite faunas of two hosts inhabiting different environments are always different, whilst hosts living in similar environments can have either very similar or dissimilar parasite faunas. Additional tests showed that dissimilarity in flea or mite faunas between host geographic ranges was best explained by dissimilarity in vegetation, followed by dissimilarity in climatic conditions. Thus, external environmental factors may play greater roles than commonly thought in the evolution of host-parasite associations. (c) 2009 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20036668     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  16 in total

Review 1.  The comparative ecology and biogeography of parasites.

Authors:  Robert Poulin; Boris R Krasnov; David Mouillot; David W Thieltges
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The effects of environment, hosts and space on compositional, phylogenetic and functional beta-diversity in two taxa of arthropod ectoparasites.

Authors:  Boris R Krasnov; Georgy I Shenbrot; Natalia P Korallo-Vinarskaya; Maxim V Vinarski; Elizabeth M Warburton; Irina S Khokhlova
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Beta-diversity of ectoparasites at two spatial scales: nested hierarchy, geography and habitat type.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Warburton; Luther van der Mescht; Michal Stanko; Maxim V Vinarski; Natalia P Korallo-Vinarskaya; Irina S Khokhlova; Boris R Krasnov
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  The fauna and perspective of rodentia ectoparasites in Iran relying on their roles within public health and veterinary characteristics.

Authors:  Mousa Khosravani
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2017-10-03

5.  Dark host specificity in two ectoparasite taxa: repeatability, parasite traits, and environmental effects.

Authors:  Boris R Krasnov; Maxim V Vinarski; Natalia P Korallo-Vinarskaya; Georgy I Shenbrot; Irina S Khokhlova
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Low functional β-diversity despite high taxonomic β-diversity among tropical estuarine fish communities.

Authors:  Sébastien Villéger; Julia Ramos Miranda; Domingo Flores Hernandez; David Mouillot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differentiation of flea communities infesting small mammals across selected habitats of the Baltic coast, central lowlands, and southern mountains of Poland.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kowalski; Urszula Eichert; Michał Bogdziewicz; Leszek Rychlik
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Niche theory-based modeling of assembly processes of viral communities in bats.

Authors:  Fabiola Nieto-Rabiela; Oscar Rico-Chávez; Gerardo Suzán; Christopher R Stephens
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  Host specialization in ticks and transmission of tick-borne diseases: a review.

Authors:  Karen D McCoy; Elsa Léger; Muriel Dietrich
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  The influence of life history characteristics on flea (Siphonaptera) species distribution models.

Authors:  Luther van der Mescht; Peter C le Roux; Conrad A Matthee; Morgan J Raath; Sonja Matthee
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.