Literature DB >> 20036134

Long-term outcomes after surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease: valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement.

Joon Bum Kim1, Hee Jung Kim, Duk Hwan Moon, Sung Ho Jung, Suk Jung Choo, Cheol Hyun Chung, Hyun Song, Jae Won Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although mitral valve (MV) repair is known to be superior to replacement in overall clinical outcomes, the appropriateness of valve repair for rheumatic MV disease remains controversial because of the risks of recurrent mitral dysfunction and the need for re-operation.
METHODS: From 1997 to 2007, 540 patients underwent either isolated MV repair (n=122) or replacement with a mechanical prosthesis (n=418) in treatment of rheumatic MV disease. Survival and morbidity were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, including propensity score analysis.
RESULTS: Follow-up was complete in 96.1% of patients (mean, 71.8+/-39.1 months). Patients undergoing repair were younger; more likely to have predominant mitral regurgitation; and less likely to show atrial fibrillation (AF), significant tricuspid regurgitation or pulmonary hypertension, than those undergoing replacement. The 10-year freedom from cardiac death rate was 92.0+/-4.2% following repair and 86.8+/-2.3% following replacement (P=0.042). After adjustment for baseline differences, repair and replacement were found to be similar in terms of cardiac survival (P=0.25), re-operation (P=0.68) and thrombo-embolic complication (P=0.20) rates. Replacement patients had more anticoagulation therapy-related complications (P=0.030). Independent factors positively associated with combined cardiac death and major morbidities included older patient age (P=0.010), uncorrected AF (P=0.015) and the presence of significant tricuspid regurgitation (P=0.012) or coronary disease (P=0.043). The influence of the type of MV surgery was statistically marginal (P=0.093).
CONCLUSIONS: When performed for selected patients, MV repair had excellent durability comparable to mechanical valve replacement in rheumatic disease. Both MV repair and replacement had comparable long-term clinical results; therefore, repair surgery seems to be more beneficial by avoiding troublesome life-long anticoagulation and risks of bleeding. Copyright 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20036134     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  19 in total

1.  Mitral valve repair versus replacement for moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing concomitant aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Gwan Sic Kim; Joon Bum Kim; Seungbong Han; Suk Jung Choo; Cheol Hyun Chung; Jae Won Lee; Sung-Ho Jung
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-09-30

2.  Is retraction of leaflets the principal pathology in rheumatic mitral stenosis?

Authors:  Mert Kestelli; Ismail Yurekli; Pinar Kestelli; Ali Gurbuz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  Review of mitral valve insufficiency: repair or replacement.

Authors:  Athanasios Madesis; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Paul Zarogoulidis; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Nikolaos Machairiotis; Ioanna Kougioumtzi; George Kesisis; Theodora Tsiouda; Thomas Beleveslis; Alexander Koletas; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Is rheumatic mitral valve repair still a feasible alternative?: indications, technique, and results.

Authors:  Ihsan Bakir; Burak Onan; Ismihan Selen Onan; Mehmet Gul; Nevzat Uslu
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

5.  Outcomes after mitral valve surgery for rheumatic heart disease.

Authors:  E Anne Russell; Warren F Walsh; Christopher M Reid; Lavinia Tran; Alex Brown; Jayme S Bennetts; Robert A Baker; Robert Tam; Graeme P Maguire
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-06-19

6.  A meta-analysis of late outcomes of mitral valve repair in patients with rheumatic heart disease.

Authors:  Jin-Tao Fu; Mohammad Sharif Popal; Hai-Bo Zhang; Wei Han; Qiu-Ming Hu; Xu Meng; Chun-Ye Ma
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Rheumatic mitral regurgitation: is repair justified by the long-term results?

Authors:  Cinzia Trumello; Ilaria Giambuzzi; Giorgia Bonalumi; Marta Bargagna; Moreno Naliato; Stefania Ruggeri; Daniele Fileccia; Alessandro Castiglioni; Ottavio Alfieri; Francesco Alamanni; Michele De Bonis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-18

8.  A predictor for mitral valve repair in patient with rheumatic heart disease: the bending angle of anterior mitral leaflet.

Authors:  Jin-Tao Fu; Mohammad Sharif Popal; Yu-Qing Jiao; Hai-Bo Zhang; Shuai Zheng; Qiu-Ming Hu; Wei Han; Xu Meng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Profile of adult patients presenting for rheumatic mitral valve surgery at a tertiary academic hospital.

Authors:  Nolwazi Mokitimi; Katherina van der Donck; Hlamatsi Moutlana; Palesa Motshabi Chakane
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 1.167

Review 10.  Rheumatic Heart Disease in the Twenty-First Century.

Authors:  Bethel Woldu; Gerald S Bloomfield
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.