BACKGROUND: Autopsy examination has been the bedrock of western medicine. With the decline in the autopsy rate secondary to the negative psychological impact to the deceased's relatives, the benefits of autopsy have been undermined. Minimally invasive autopsy has been introduced but has not been widely adopted as an alternative to the 'traditional' open approach. This technique not only provides information on the cause of death abut also minimizes the disfigurement induced to the deceased. Our study aims to explore the feasibility and evaluate the accuracy of this technique. METHODS: A series of coroner cases ordered for autopsy were examined by a group including an experienced forensic pathologist and two experienced laparoscopic surgeons using thoracoscopic, laparoscopic, endoluminal or endovascular approaches. The procedure was video-recorded and the provisional diagnoses and causes of death were made based on the findings. These findings were subsequently correlated with the full autopsy examination. A few limited clinical post-mortem examinations were also performed with consent from relatives. RESULTS: A total of 22 cases of minimally invasive autopsies were performed from November 2007 to March 2008. The median duration of the procedures was 78.3+/-20.7 min. Thoracoscopies and laparoscopies were performed in 18 patients while additional arterioscopic examination with endoscope was performed in two patients with suspected aortic diseases. Four consented limited clinical autopsies were also performed: two of them involved thoracoscopic biopsies of lung tissues, one was a para-mortem upper endoscopy for the investigation of pathology of the stomach and the other one was laparoscopy for a patient, who died of unexplained acidosis. Comparison with full autopsies showed that the accuracy of the diagnosis was 94.4%, the sensitivity was 90%, the specificity was 100%, the positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 88.9%. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive autopsy is a feasible approach, yielding accurate findings when compared with conventional autopsies. The former can be a valuable tool for obtaining more valuable information in situations when the next-of-kin of the deceased does not consent to a conventional autopsy. 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Autopsy examination has been the bedrock of western medicine. With the decline in the autopsy rate secondary to the negative psychological impact to the deceased's relatives, the benefits of autopsy have been undermined. Minimally invasive autopsy has been introduced but has not been widely adopted as an alternative to the 'traditional' open approach. This technique not only provides information on the cause of death abut also minimizes the disfigurement induced to the deceased. Our study aims to explore the feasibility and evaluate the accuracy of this technique. METHODS: A series of coroner cases ordered for autopsy were examined by a group including an experienced forensic pathologist and two experienced laparoscopic surgeons using thoracoscopic, laparoscopic, endoluminal or endovascular approaches. The procedure was video-recorded and the provisional diagnoses and causes of death were made based on the findings. These findings were subsequently correlated with the full autopsy examination. A few limited clinical post-mortem examinations were also performed with consent from relatives. RESULTS: A total of 22 cases of minimally invasive autopsies were performed from November 2007 to March 2008. The median duration of the procedures was 78.3+/-20.7 min. Thoracoscopies and laparoscopies were performed in 18 patients while additional arterioscopic examination with endoscope was performed in two patients with suspected aortic diseases. Four consented limited clinical autopsies were also performed: two of them involved thoracoscopic biopsies of lung tissues, one was a para-mortem upper endoscopy for the investigation of pathology of the stomach and the other one was laparoscopy for a patient, who died of unexplained acidosis. Comparison with full autopsies showed that the accuracy of the diagnosis was 94.4%, the sensitivity was 90%, the specificity was 100%, the positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 88.9%. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive autopsy is a feasible approach, yielding accurate findings when compared with conventional autopsies. The former can be a valuable tool for obtaining more valuable information in situations when the next-of-kin of the deceased does not consent to a conventional autopsy. 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: David Adlam; Shiju Joseph; Claire Robinson; Clement Rousseau; Jade Barber; Mike Biggs; Bruno Morgan; Guy Rutty Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Britt M Blokker; Ivo M Wagensveld; Annick C Weustink; J Wolter Oosterhuis; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Navit T Salzberg; Kasthuri Sivalogan; Quique Bassat; Allan W Taylor; Sunday Adedini; Shams El Arifeen; Nega Assefa; Dianna M Blau; Richard Chawana; Carrie Jo Cain; Kevin P Cain; J Patrick Caneer; Mischka Garel; Emily S Gurley; Reinhard Kaiser; Karen L Kotloff; Inacio Mandomando; Timothy Morris; Peter Nyamthimba Onyango; Hossain M S Sazzad; J Anthony G Scott; Anna C Seale; Antonio Sitoe; Samba O Sow; Milagritos D Tapia; Ellen A Whitney; Mary Claire Worrell; Emily Zielinski-Gutierrez; Shabir A Madhi; Pratima L Raghunathan; Jeffrey P Koplan; Robert F Breiman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Sarah Lawrence; Dave Namusanya; Andrew Hamuza; Cornelius Huwa; Dennis Chasweka; Maureen Kelley; Sassy Molyneux; Wieger Voskuijl; Donna M Denno; Nicola Desmond Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Veroniek Saegeman; Marta C Cohen; Julian L Burton; Miguel J Martinez; Natalia Rakislova; Amaka C Offiah; Amparo Fernandez-Rodriguez Journal: Forensic Sci Med Pathol Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Erika Feutz; Wieger Voskuijl; Peter J Finch; Ta-Chiang Liu; Robert H J Bandsma; Phillip I Tarr; Christopher Alan Moxon; Kelley VanBuskirk; Sarah Lawrence; Grace Umutesi; Kirkby D Tickell; James A Berkley; Judd L Walson; Steve Kamiza; Donna M Denno Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 20.999