Literature DB >> 20035904

Variability of the ventilatory response to Duffin's modified hyperoxic and hypoxic rebreathing procedure in healthy awake humans.

Dennis Jensen1, Graeme Mask, Michael E Tschakovsky.   

Abstract

We quantified the magnitude of within- and between-day, within-subject variability of the ventilatory response to Duffin's modified rebreathing procedure in 20 healthy humans. The P(ETCO2) at which ventilation increased with progressive increases in P(ETCO2) during rebreathing was identified as the ventilatory recruitment threshold (VRT(CO2)); the ventilatory response below and above the VRT(CO2) was taken as an estimate of non-chemoreflex drives to breathe (V(EB)) and chemoreflex sensitivity (V(ES)), respectively. Within- and between-day intraclass correlation coefficients for each of these parameters were >0.60 (range: 0.62-0.93), indicating good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Within- and between-day, within-subject coefficients of variation for hyperoxic and hypoxic V(EB) (range: 24.6-30.7%) and V(ES) (range: 18.5-32.7%) were relatively high but acceptable, while those for the VRT(CO2) were very small (range: 3.0-3.8%). In conclusion, Duffin's modified rebreathing procedure, in both its hyperoxic and hypoxic form, is a highly reliable tool for measurement of chemoreflex and non-chemoreflex ventilatory control characteristics over short and long periods of time in healthy humans. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035904     DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2009.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol        ISSN: 1569-9048            Impact factor:   1.931


  6 in total

1.  Differences in the control of breathing between Himalayan and sea-level residents.

Authors:  M Slessarev; E Prisman; S Ito; R R Watson; D Jensen; D Preiss; R Greene; T Norboo; T Stobdan; D Diskit; A Norboo; M Kunzang; O Appenzeller; J Duffin; J A Fisher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Differences in the control of breathing between Andean highlanders and lowlanders after 10 days acclimatization at 3850 m.

Authors:  Marat Slessarev; Alexandra Mardimae; David Preiss; Alex Vesely; Dahlia Y Balaban; Richard Greene; James Duffin; Joseph A Fisher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The cerebrovascular response to carbon dioxide in humans.

Authors:  A Battisti-Charbonney; J Fisher; J Duffin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Measuring cerebrovascular reactivity: what stimulus to use?

Authors:  J Fierstra; O Sobczyk; A Battisti-Charbonney; D M Mandell; J Poublanc; A P Crawley; D J Mikulis; J Duffin; J A Fisher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The need for specificity in quantifying neurocirculatory vs. respiratory effects of eucapnic hypoxia and transient hyperoxia.

Authors:  Bharati Prasad; Barbara J Morgan; Ahana Gupta; David F Pegelow; Mihaela Teodorescu; John M Dopp; Jerome A Dempsey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Reproducibility of hypercapnic ventilatory response measurements with steady-state and rebreathing methods.

Authors:  Denise C Mannée; Timon M Fabius; Michiel Wagenaar; Michiel M M Eijsvogel; Frans H C de Jongh
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2018-02-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.