OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: This was a 7-week, open-label study evaluating 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, or 70 mg/day LDX in 318 children aged 6-12 years with ADHD. The ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) was the primary efficacy assessment. Secondary measures included the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), Expression and Emotion Scale for Children (EESC), and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: At end point, mean (standard deviation [SD]) improvement from baseline in ADHD-RS-IV total score was 28.6 (10.9) (p < 0.0001). Most subjects (89.9%) were rated "improved" (i.e., CGI-I 1 or 2). Improvements from baseline were observed in the EESC total and subscale scores (p < or = 0.0002). LDX treatment resulted in significant improvement on the Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Regulation, and Metacognition indices of the BRIEF (p < 0.0001). TEAEs (incidences > or =10%) were decreased appetite, decreased weight, irritability, insomnia, headache, upper abdominal pain, and initial insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: LDX was effective and generally well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with long-acting stimulant use. There was overall improvement in ADHD symptoms and executive function measures and no worsening of emotional expression measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00500071.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: This was a 7-week, open-label study evaluating 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, or 70 mg/day LDX in 318 children aged 6-12 years with ADHD. The ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) was the primary efficacy assessment. Secondary measures included the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), Expression and Emotion Scale for Children (EESC), and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: At end point, mean (standard deviation [SD]) improvement from baseline in ADHD-RS-IV total score was 28.6 (10.9) (p < 0.0001). Most subjects (89.9%) were rated "improved" (i.e., CGI-I 1 or 2). Improvements from baseline were observed in the EESC total and subscale scores (p < or = 0.0002). LDX treatment resulted in significant improvement on the Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Regulation, and Metacognition indices of the BRIEF (p < 0.0001). TEAEs (incidences > or =10%) were decreased appetite, decreased weight, irritability, insomnia, headache, upper abdominal pain, and initial insomnia. CONCLUSIONS:LDX was effective and generally well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with long-acting stimulant use. There was overall improvement in ADHD symptoms and executive function measures and no worsening of emotional expression measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00500071.
Authors: Atilla Turgay; Lawrence Ginsberg; Elias Sarkis; Rakesh Jain; Ben Adeyi; Joseph Gao; Bryan Dirks; Thomas Babcock; Brian Scheckner; Cynthia Richards; Robert Lasser; Robert L Findling Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Kevin M Antshel; Teresa M Hargrave; Mihai Simonescu; Prashant Kaul; Kaitlin Hendricks; Stephen V Faraone Journal: BMC Med Date: 2011-06-10 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Rakesh Jain; Thomas Babcock; Teodor Burtea; Bryan Dirks; Ben Adeyi; Brian Scheckner; Robert Lasser; John Renna; Don Duncan Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 3.845