Literature DB >> 20035331

Absolute risk reduction in osteoporosis: assessing treatment efficacy by number needed to treat.

Johann D Ringe1, John G Doherty.   

Abstract

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a chronic condition due to decreased bone mass, leading to reduced bone strength and increased fracture risk. Currently available pharmacological treatments include antiresorptive agents (bisphosphonates and raloxifene) and bone-forming agents (strontium ranelate and two different parathyroid peptides). Comparison via reduction in relative risk of fracture may produce artificially high reductions in fracture risk for some agents. Responder analysis based on absolute risk reduction (ARR, the arithmetic difference between events rates with and without treatment over a fixed time) and a related parameter, number needed to treat (NNT, the number of patients needed to treat over a fixed time to prevent one event) may provide more reliable parameters. We reviewed placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, pivotal phase 3 trials employed as part of the regulatory process, in order to calculate ARRs and NNTs for vertebral and hip fracture over 3 years for antiosteoporotic agents currently available in Europe. The NNT values to prevent one vertebral fracture over 3 years range from 9 for the strontium ranelate to 21 for ibandronate. NNT values for hip fracture over 3 years range from 48 for strontium ranelate to 91 for three of the bisphosphonates. Our analysis indicates that the bone-forming agent strontium ranelate may have the lowest NNT for the prevention of both vertebral and hip fracture. Responder analysis may enable translation of clinical trial results into guidance for routine clinical practice by indicating the amount of effort needed to prevent the same event in comparable populations with different treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035331     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-009-1311-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  26 in total

1.  Using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice.

Authors:  H J McQuay; R A Moore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Peter C Wyer; Rose Hatala; Thomas McGinn; Antonio L Dans; Sheri Keitz; Virginia Moyer; Gordon Guyatt For
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Straight talk about disease prevention.

Authors:  Harold C Sox
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.

Authors:  William H Replogle; William D Johnson
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect.

Authors:  R J Cook; D L Sackett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

6.  Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low-trauma fractures in elderly people (Randomised Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D, RECORD): a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  A M Grant; A Avenell; M K Campbell; A M McDonald; G S MacLennan; G C McPherson; F H Anderson; C Cooper; R M Francis; C Donaldson; W J Gillespie; C M Robinson; D J Torgerson; W A Wallace
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 7-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Pierre D Delmas; Richard Eastell; Ian R Reid; Steven Boonen; Jane A Cauley; Felicia Cosman; Péter Lakatos; Ping Chung Leung; Zulema Man; Carlos Mautalen; Peter Mesenbrink; Huilin Hu; John Caminis; Karen Tong; Theresa Rosario-Jansen; Joel Krasnow; Trisha F Hue; Deborah Sellmeyer; Erik Fink Eriksen; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Effects of oral ibandronate administered daily or intermittently on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Charles H Chesnut; Arne Skag; Claus Christiansen; Robert Recker; Jacob A Stakkestad; Arne Hoiseth; Dieter Felsenberg; Hermann Huss; Jennifer Gilbride; Ralph C Schimmer; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Effect of raloxifene on the risk of new vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis: a reanalysis of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation trial.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Dennis M Black; Robert W Downs; Somnath Sarkar; Thomas Fuerst; Roberta J Secrest; Imre Pavo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comment on Compston: pathophysiology of atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Authors:  K Michaëlsson; J Schilcher; P Aspenberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Should we really compare absolute risk reduction in different trials on osteoporosis: comment on the article by Ringe JD and Doherty JG.

Authors:  Zhanna E Belaya
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Strontium ranelate: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks; Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Skeletal complications of bisphosphonate use: what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  A E Haworth; J Webb
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Uses and misuses of statistics: the case of strontium ranelate and the number needed to treat.

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; A Giusti; G Pioli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Addressing the age-related needs of osteoporotic patients with strontium ranelate.

Authors:  S Boonen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Strontium ranelate: an effective solution for diverse fracture risks.

Authors:  J D Ringe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Eldecalcitol: a review of its use in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mark Sanford; Paul L McCormack
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Treating osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akhil Gupta; Lyn March
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2016-04-01

10.  Statins and hip fracture prevention--a population based cohort study in women.

Authors:  Arja Helin-Salmivaara; Maarit J Korhonen; Petri Lehenkari; Seppo Y T Junnila; Pertti J Neuvonen; Päivi Ruokoniemi; Risto Huupponen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.