Literature DB >> 20035022

The constitutive activity of the human muscarinic M3 receptor unmasks differences in the pharmacology of anticholinergics.

Paola Casarosa1, Tobias Kiechle, Peter Sieger, Michael Pieper, Florian Gantner.   

Abstract

An activator protein 1-driven luciferase reporter assay was developed to monitor the activation of the human muscarinic M3 receptor (hM3-R) and evaluate functional potencies of different anticholinergics in Chinese hamster ovary cells. This assay proved to be superior to previously used functional assays [i.e., inositol phosphate accumulation (J Pharmacol Exp Ther 330:660-668, 2009)], thanks to the longer incubation times that allow reaching of pseudoequilibrium for ligands with slower dissociation kinetics, the long-acting muscarinic antagonists. Interestingly, within this system the hM3-R efficiently signaled in an agonist-independent manner. All the antagonists tested were able to inhibit the hM3-R constitutive activity in a concentration-dependent fashion, behaving as full inverse agonists. Curiously, significant differences in potency as antagonists (against carbachol) and inverse agonists were seen for some compounds (N-methyl scopolamine and tiotropium). Given the potential for inverse agonists to cause receptor up-regulation, the effect of chronic exposure to anticholinergics on the expression levels of hM3-R was also tested. Again, significant differences were seen, with some ligands (e.g., tiotropium) producing less than half of the receptor up-regulation caused by other anticholinergics. This study shows that anticholinergics can exhibit differential behaviors, which depend on the pathway investigated, and therefore provides evidence that the molecular mechanism of inverse agonism is likely to be more complex than the stabilization of a single inactive receptor conformation. In addition, differences in the potential of anticholinergics to induce hM3-R up-regulation might have clinical relevance, because many are on the market or in clinical trials as chronic treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, for example.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035022     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.163188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Association Between Anticholinergic Medication Burden and Health Related Outcomes in the 'Oldest Old': A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Karen Cardwell; Carmel M Hughes; Cristín Ryan
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Asthma Therapy: Pharmacology and Drug Action.

Authors:  Stacy Gelhaus Wendell; Hao Fan; Cheng Zhang
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Associations between different measures of anticholinergic drug exposure and Barthel Index in older hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Clare V Bostock; Roy L Soiza; Arduino A Mangoni
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2013-12

Review 4.  Muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists: effects on cancer.

Authors:  Eliot R Spindel
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2012

5.  Lack of cholinergic innervation in gastric mucosa does not affect gastrin secretion or basal acid output in neurturin receptor GFRα2 deficient mice.

Authors:  Jussi Kupari; Jari Rossi; Karl-Heinz Herzig; Matti S Airaksinen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Minimizing anticholinergic drug prescribing in older hospitalized patients: a full audit cycle.

Authors:  Hui Sian Tay; Roy L Soiza; Arduino A Mangoni
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-06

Review 7.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor X-ray structures: potential implications for drug development.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Jianxin Hu; Brian K Kobilka; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.547

8.  Structure and dynamics of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Jianxin Hu; Albert C Pan; Daniel H Arlow; Daniel M Rosenbaum; Erica Rosemond; Hillary F Green; Tong Liu; Pil Seok Chae; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw; William I Weis; Jürgen Wess; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Pharmacologic rationale underlying the therapeutic effects of tiotropium/olodaterol in COPD.

Authors:  Girolamo Pelaia; Alessandro Vatrella; Maria Teresa Busceti; Luca Gallelli; Cecilia Calabrese; Rosa Terracciano; Nicola Lombardo; Rosario Maselli
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 10.  Biological Mechanisms of Atropine Control of Myopia.

Authors:  Aradhana Upadhyay; Roger W Beuerman
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.152

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.