Literature DB >> 20034975

Is the use of an additional pace/sense lead the optimal strategy for the avoidance of lead extraction in defibrillation lead failure? A single-centre experience.

Paul A Scott1, Aman Chungh, Mehmood Zeb, Arthur M Yue, Paul R Roberts, John M Morgan.   

Abstract

AIMS: The implantation of an additional pace-sense (P/S) lead is a standard treatment option in the management of an isolated pace-sense problem in a defibrillation (HV-P/S) lead. However, the safety of this management strategy is unclear. We performed a retrospective single-centre study to assess this. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied all patients with an isolated P/S problem in an HV-P/S lead, treated with an additional P/S lead, in our institution. The need for further invasive intervention for a lead-related complication, or death during follow-up, was assessed. From 2000 to 2008, 45 patients were treated with an additional P/S lead. Mean follow-up was 78 +/- 38 months from original device implantation and 28 +/- 17 months following implantation of the additional lead. During follow-up, three patients required an invasive intervention for a lead-related problem. All were successfully treated with lead extraction and device re-implantation. There were five deaths. Following implant of an additional lead, cumulative survival from further lead defects after 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years was 100, 100, 93, and 87%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In the treatment of an isolated P/S problem in an HV-P/S lead, the placement of an additional P/S lead is a safe management strategy, at least in the short term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20034975     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  2 in total

1.  Outcomes 1 Year After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Abandonment Versus Explantation for Unused or Malfunctioning Leads: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Emily P Zeitler; Yongfei Wang; Kumar Dharmarajan; Kevin J Anstrom; Eric D Peterson; James P Daubert; Jeptha P Curtis; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-07

2.  Evolution of Procedure Indication and Cardiovascular Risk in Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Daniel Hofer; Michelle C Bebié; Noah Kuster; Jan Steffel; Alexander Breitenstein
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.