Literature DB >> 20034582

fMRI-adaptation evidence of overlapping neural representations for objects related in function or manipulation.

Eiling Yee1, Daniel M Drucker, Sharon L Thompson-Schill.   

Abstract

Sensorimotor-based theories of semantic memory contend that semantic information about an object is represented in the neural substrate invoked when we perceive or interact with it. We used fMRI adaptation to test this prediction, measuring brain activation as participants read pairs of words. Pairs shared function (flashlight-lantern), shape (marble-grape), both (pencil-pen), were unrelated (saucer-needle), or were identical (drill-drill). We observed adaptation for pairs with both function and shape similarity in left premotor cortex. Further, degree of function similarity was correlated with adaptation in three regions: two in the left temporal lobe (left medial temporal lobe, left middle temporal gyrus), which has been hypothesized to play a role in mutimodal integration, and one in left superior frontal gyrus. We also found that degree of manipulation (i.e., action) and function similarity were both correlated with adaptation in two regions: left premotor cortex and left intraparietal sulcus (involved in guiding actions). Additional considerations suggest that the adaptation in these two regions was driven by manipulation similarity alone; thus, these results imply that manipulation information about objects is encoded in brain regions involved in performing or guiding actions. Unexpectedly, these same two regions showed increased activation (rather than adaptation) for objects similar in shape. Overall, we found evidence (in the form of adaptation) that objects that share semantic features have overlapping representations. Further, the particular regions of overlap provide support for the existence of both sensorimotor and amodal/multimodal representations. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action; adaptation; fMRI; repetition suppression; semantic attributes; semantic features; semantic representations

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20034582      PMCID: PMC2836190          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  56 in total

1.  A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge.

Authors:  S L Thompson-Schill; G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito; M J Farah
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex.

Authors:  Russell Epstein; Kim S Graham; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.

Authors:  Marion L Kellenbach; Matthew Brett; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Brain activity during automatic semantic priming revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  David A Copland; Greig I de Zubicaray; Katie McMahon; Stephen J Wilson; Matt Eastburn; Helen J Chenery
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Joseph W Kable; Irene P Kan; Ashley Wilson; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Nicola Canessa; Francesca Borgo; Stefano F Cappa; Daniela Perani; Andrea Falini; Giovanni Buccino; Marco Tettamanti; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

Authors:  K McRae; V R de Sa; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

8.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Consuelo B Boronat; Laurel J Buxbaum; H Branch Coslett; Kathy Tang; Eleanor M Saffran; Daniel Y Kimberg; John A Detre
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-07

Review 9.  Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective.

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 10.  From sensation to cognition.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  15 in total

1.  Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.

Authors:  Francesco De Bellis; Antonia Ferrara; Domenico Errico; Francesco Panico; Laura Sagliano; Massimiliano Conson; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Action semantics and movement characteristics engage distinct processing streams during the observation of tool use.

Authors:  Markus Hoeren; Christoph P Kaller; Volkmar Glauche; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Michel Rijntjes; Farsin Hamzei; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Traits are represented in the medial prefrontal cortex: an fMRI adaptation study.

Authors:  Ning Ma; Kris Baetens; Marie Vandekerckhove; Jenny Kestemont; Wim Fias; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Multiple object properties drive scene-selective regions.

Authors:  Vanessa Troiani; Anthony Stigliani; Mary E Smith; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The Representation of Object-Directed Action and Function Knowledge in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Quanjing Chen; Frank E Garcea; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Abstract Representations of Object-Directed Action in the Left Inferior Parietal Lobule.

Authors:  Quanjing Chen; Frank E Garcea; Robert A Jacobs; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Motor experience influences object knowledge.

Authors:  Evangelia G Chrysikou; Daniel Casasanto; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-03

Review 8.  Neural correlates of embodied action language processing: a systematic review and meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Chiara Giacobbe; Simona Raimo; Maria Cropano; Gabriella Santangelo
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.224

9.  Spontaneously reactivated patterns in frontal and temporal lobe predict semantic clustering during memory search.

Authors:  Jeremy R Manning; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Emily A Rosenberg; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Compositionality and the angular gyrus: A multi-voxel similarity analysis of the semantic composition of nouns and verbs.

Authors:  Christine Boylan; John C Trueswell; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.