Literature DB >> 20034578

Real versus imagined locomotion: a [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison.

Christian la Fougère1, Andreas Zwergal, Axel Rominger, Stefan Förster, Gunther Fesl, Marianne Dieterich, Thomas Brandt, Michael Strupp, Peter Bartenstein, Klaus Jahn.   

Abstract

The cortical, cerebellar and brainstem BOLD-signal changes have been identified with fMRI in humans during mental imagery of walking. In this study the whole brain activation and deactivation pattern during real locomotion was investigated by [(18)F]-FDG-PET and compared to BOLD-signal changes during imagined locomotion in the same subjects using fMRI. Sixteen healthy subjects were scanned at locomotion and rest with [(18)F]-FDG-PET. In the locomotion paradigm subjects walked at constant velocity for 10 min. Then [(18)F]-FDG was injected intravenously while subjects continued walking for another 10 min. For comparison fMRI was performed in the same subjects during imagined walking. During real and imagined locomotion a basic locomotion network including activations in the frontal cortex, cerebellum, pontomesencephalic tegmentum, parahippocampal, fusiform and occipital gyri, and deactivations in the multisensory vestibular cortices (esp. superior temporal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule) was shown. As a difference, the primary motor and somatosensory cortices were activated during real locomotion as distinct to the supplementary motor cortex and basal ganglia during imagined locomotion. Activations of the brainstem locomotor centers were more prominent in imagined locomotion. In conclusion, basic activation and deactivation patterns of real locomotion correspond to that of imagined locomotion. The differences may be due to distinct patterns of locomotion tested. Contrary to constant velocity real locomotion (10 min) in [(18)F]-FDG-PET, mental imagery of locomotion over repeated 20-s periods includes gait initiation and velocity changes. Real steady-state locomotion seems to use a direct pathway via the primary motor cortex, whereas imagined modulatory locomotion an indirect pathway via a supplementary motor cortex and basal ganglia loop. 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20034578     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  137 in total

1.  [Functional imaging in neurology].

Authors:  C Weiller; T Brandt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Trade-off between frequency and precision during stepping movements: Kinematic and BOLD brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Martin Martínez; Miguel Valencia; Marta Vidorreta; Elkin O Luis; Gabriel Castellanos; Federico Villagra; Maria A Fernández-Seara; Maria A Pastor
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The influence of individual motor imagery ability on cerebral recruitment during gait imagery.

Authors:  Marian van der Meulen; Gilles Allali; Sebastian W Rieger; Frédéric Assal; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Association between Various Brain Pathologies and Gait Disturbance.

Authors:  Alexandra M V Wennberg; Rodolfo Savica; Michelle M Mielke
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.959

5.  Behavioral and neural correlates of imagined walking and walking-while-talking in the elderly.

Authors:  Helena M Blumen; Roee Holtzer; Lucy L Brown; Yunglin Gazes; Joe Verghese
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Brain activity during complex imagined gait tasks in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Daniel S Peterson; Kristen A Pickett; Ryan P Duncan; Joel S Perlmutter; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  The integrative role of the pedunculopontine nucleus in human gait.

Authors:  Brian Lau; Marie-Laure Welter; Hayat Belaid; Sara Fernandez Vidal; Eric Bardinet; David Grabli; Carine Karachi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Online fronto-cortical control of simple and attention-demanding locomotion in humans.

Authors:  Roee Holtzer; Jeannette R Mahoney; Meltem Izzetoglu; Cuiling Wang; Sarah England; Joe Verghese
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A novel real-space navigation paradigm reveals age- and gender-dependent changes of navigational strategies and hippocampal activation.

Authors:  Stephanie Irving; Florian Schöberl; Cauchy Pradhan; Matthias Brendel; Peter Bartenstein; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt; Andreas Zwergal
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Alterations in resting functional connectivity due to recent motor task.

Authors:  Kuang-Chi Tung; Jinsoo Uh; Deng Mao; Feng Xu; Guanghua Xiao; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.