Literature DB >> 20034498

Selection for fitness at the individual or population levels: modelling effects of genetic modifications in microalgae on productivity and environmental safety.

Kevin J Flynn1, H Christopher Greenwell, Robert W Lovitt, Robin J Shields.   

Abstract

A mechanistic model of microalgae is used to explore the implications of modifying microalgal chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency with an aim to optimising commercial biomass production. The models show the potential for a 10 fold increase in microalgae productivity in genetically modified versus unmodified configurations, while also enabling the use of bioreactors of greater optical depth operating at lower dilution rates. Analysis suggests that natural selection of a trait benefiting the individual (high Chl:C(max), i.e., high antennae size) conflicts with artificial selection of a trait (low Chl:C(max)) of most benefit to production at the population level. The implication is that GM strains rather than strains selected from nature will be most beneficial for commercial algal biofuels production. Further, escaped GM algae populations may, depending on the specific nature of the modification, be quickly out-competed by the natural forms because individually a high Chl:C is beneficial in low light environments. However, it remains possible that changes in biochemical composition associated with genetic modification of photosystem competence, or with other selection processes to enhance commercial gain, may adversely affect the value of such organisms as prey for zooplankton, leading to the unwanted generation of future harmful algae. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20034498     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  7 in total

1.  Monster potential meets potential monster: pros and cons of deploying genetically modified microalgae for biofuels production.

Authors:  K J Flynn; A Mitra; H C Greenwell; J Sui
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Placing microalgae on the biofuels priority list: a review of the technological challenges.

Authors:  H C Greenwell; L M L Laurens; R J Shields; R W Lovitt; K J Flynn
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Modifications of the metabolic pathways of lipid and triacylglycerol production in microalgae.

Authors:  Wei-Luen Yu; William Ansari; Nathan G Schoepp; Michael J Hannon; Stephen P Mayfield; Michael D Burkart
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.328

4.  In silico optimization for production of biomass and biofuel feedstocks from microalgae.

Authors:  Philip Kenny; Kevin J Flynn
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Competitive growth experiments with a high-lipid Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutant strain and its wild-type to predict industrial and ecological risks.

Authors:  David A Russo; Andrew P Beckerman; Jagroop Pandhal
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Minimising losses to predation during microalgae cultivation.

Authors:  Kevin J Flynn; Philip Kenny; Aditee Mitra
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 7.  Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture.

Authors:  Deepali Chittora; Mukesh Meena; Tansukh Barupal; Prashant Swapnil
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2020-02-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.