Literature DB >> 20034489

Interactions between Notch- and hypoxia-induced transcriptomes in embryonic stem cells.

Heather Main1, Kian Leong Lee, Henry Yang, Saija Haapa-Paananen, Henrik Edgren, Shaobo Jin, Cecilia Sahlgren, Olli Kallioniemi, Lorenz Poellinger, Bing Lim, Urban Lendahl.   

Abstract

Interaction between key signaling mechanisms is important to generate the diversity in signaling output required for proper control of cellular differentiation and function, although the molecular manifestations of such cross-talk are only partially understood. Notch signaling and the cellular response to hypoxia intersect at different points in the signaling cascades, and in this report we analyze the consequences of this cross-talk at the transcriptome level. Mouse ES cells were subjected to various combinations of hypoxia and/or activated Notch signaling, and the transcriptome changes could be grouped into different categories, reflecting various modes of hypoxia and Notch signaling integration. Two principal categories of novel Notch- and hypoxia-induced genes were identified: (i) a larger set of Notch or hypoxic target genes which were induced by one pathway and not significantly affected by the activity status of the other pathway and (ii) a smaller set of genes co-regulated by Notch and hypoxia. In the latter category, we identified genes that were induced by hypoxia and the expression of which was enhanced by active Notch signaling and another group of genes that were induced by Notch and hypoxia independently. Several of the hypoxia- and Notch-induced genes were found to be upregulated in various forms of cancer. Identification of genes co-regulated by the two pathways may provide a molecular platform to better understand the intersection between the two signaling cascades in normal development and cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20034489     DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  13 in total

1.  Dissecting genealogy and cell cycle as sources of cell-to-cell variability in MAPK signaling using high-throughput lineage tracking.

Authors:  Marketa Ricicova; Mani Hamidi; Adam Quiring; Antti Niemistö; Eldon Emberly; Carl L Hansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cell surface antigen profiling using a novel type of antibody array immobilised to plasma ion-implanted polycarbonate.

Authors:  Heather Main; Jelena Radenkovic; Elena Kosobrodova; David McKenzie; Marcela Bilek; Urban Lendahl
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Activated Notch1 target genes during embryonic cell differentiation depend on the cellular context and include lineage determinants and inhibitors.

Authors:  Franziska Meier-Stiegen; Ralf Schwanbeck; Kristina Bernoth; Simone Martini; Thomas Hieronymus; David Ruau; Martin Zenke; Ursula Just
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Hypoxia-induced Jagged2 promotes breast cancer metastasis and self-renewal of cancer stem-like cells.

Authors:  F Xing; H Okuda; M Watabe; A Kobayashi; S K Pai; W Liu; P R Pandey; K Fukuda; S Hirota; T Sugai; G Wakabayshi; K Koeda; M Kashiwaba; K Suzuki; T Chiba; M Endo; Y-Y Mo; K Watabe
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  A combined gene signature of hypoxia and notch pathway in human glioblastoma and its prognostic relevance.

Authors:  Khushboo Irshad; Saroj Kant Mohapatra; Chitrangda Srivastava; Harshit Garg; Seema Mishra; Bhawana Dikshit; Chitra Sarkar; Deepak Gupta; Poodipedi Sarat Chandra; Parthaprasad Chattopadhyay; Subrata Sinha; Kunzang Chosdol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sumoylation of Notch1 represses its target gene expression during cell stress.

Authors:  Christian J M Antila; Vilma Rraklli; Henri A Blomster; Käthe M Dahlström; Tiina A Salminen; Johan Holmberg; Lea Sistonen; Cecilia Sahlgren
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 15.828

7.  Notch signaling maintains neural rosette polarity.

Authors:  Heather Main; Jelena Radenkovic; Shao-bo Jin; Urban Lendahl; Emma R Andersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Notch1 is a 5-fluorouracil resistant and poor survival marker in human esophagus squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Huijie Fan; Yuanyuan Ma; Dongming Liang; Ruixia Huang; Junsheng Wang; Fuyou Zhou; Quancheng Kan; Liang Ming; Huixiang Li; Karl-Erik Giercksky; Jahn Martin Nesland; Zhenhe Suo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Non-canonical Notch signaling activates IL-6/JAK/STAT signaling in breast tumor cells and is controlled by p53 and IKKα/IKKβ.

Authors:  S Jin; A P Mutvei; I V Chivukula; E R Andersson; D Ramsköld; R Sandberg; K L Lee; P Kronqvist; V Mamaeva; P Ostling; J-P Mpindi; O Kallioniemi; I Screpanti; L Poellinger; C Sahlgren; U Lendahl
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Notch signaling promotes a HIF2α-driven hypoxic response in multiple tumor cell types.

Authors:  Anders P Mutvei; Sebastian K-J Landor; Rhys Fox; Eike-Benjamin Braune; Yat Long Tsoi; Yee Peng Phoon; Cecilia Sahlgren; Johan Hartman; Jonas Bergh; Shaobo Jin; Urban Lendahl
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.