Literature DB >> 20033922

Determinates of underutilization of amniocentesis among Israeli Arab women.

Khitam Muhsen1, Wasef Na'amnah, Yael Lesser, Irina Volovik, Dani Cohen, Tamy Shohat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the determinants of amniocentesis underutilization among Israeli Arab Muslim women.
METHODS: Pregnant women referred for amniocentesis (n = 476) were identified through family health centers (FHCs). Data on sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of prenatal testing, and attitudes toward termination of pregnancy (TOP) were collected through interviews and from medical records.
RESULTS: Of all women eligible for amniocentesis free of charge, only 17.9% (95% CI: 14.7-21.6) underwent the test. Women referred as a result of advanced maternal age underwent the test less often than those referred for other indications [13.5% and 25.0%, respectively, (p = 0.002)]. In multivariate analyses, determinants for amniocentesis underutilization among women referred for advanced maternal age were: being religious [OR 2.71 (95% CI 1.04-7.01)], perceiving amniocentesis a risky procedure [OR 3.25 (95% CI 1.28-8.20)], spouse's opposing TOP [OR 3.73 (95% CI 1.48-9.37)], less advanced age [OR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.94)] and being a housewife [OR 2.59 (95% CI 0.96-6.95)]. In women referred for other reasons poor accessibility [OR 5.49 (95% CI 1.50-20.05)], perceiving amniocentesis a risky procedure [OR 3.45 (95% CI 1.17-10.17)] and spouse's opposing TOP [OR 7.47 (95% CI 2.46-22.63)] were the significant determinants.
CONCLUSIONS: Any program aimed at increasing amniocentesis uptake among Muslim women should be directed to both partners and should emphasize the low risk for miscarriage following the test. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20033922     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Special Features of Prenatal and Preimplantation Genetic Counseling in Arab Countries.

Authors:  Shaza D Malik; Mashael Al-Shafai; Atiyeh M Abdallah
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Prenatal diagnosis in low resource setting: is it acceptable?

Authors:  Hend Abdel Rahaman Shalaby; Reda Abd Elhady; Anas Mohamed Gamal; Ahmed Al Badry
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-10-03

Review 3.  Whole Exome Sequencing: Applications in Prenatal Genetics.

Authors:  Angie C Jelin; Neeta Vora
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected].

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Celine Lewis; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Challenges to effective and autonomous genetic testing and counseling for ethno-cultural minorities: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nehama Cohen-Kfir; Miriam Ethel Bentwich; Andrew Kent; Nomy Dickman; Mary Tanus; Basem Higazi; Limor Kalfon; Mary Rudolf; Tzipora C Falik-Zaccai
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.