Literature DB >> 20033842

Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices in children.

Ramesh Srinivasan1, Tracey Irvine, A M Dalzell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are few published data on non-endoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices in children. AIMS: To describe prospective data acquired for traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices at a single pediatric center over a 5-year period.
METHODS: Data were obtained from endoscopy records, computerized hospital patient information systems and case note analysis. The device that could be removed by traction was the Corflo (Merck) 12-Fr percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with a collapsible internal retention dome. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia.
RESULTS: Between 2002-2006, 220 children underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy removals (166 by traction, 51 endoscopically and 3 Foley catheter to button conversions). The median duration between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion and low profile button device substitution was 0.83 years (0.12-3.86). Complications from traction removal included internal retention dome separation in two cases (allowed to pass per rectum, uneventfully), failure to a insert a low profile button device needing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy reinsertion, enterocutaneous fistula requiring surgical closure in one patient and laparoscopy for suspected low profile button device misplacement in one instance. The material cost of endoscope disinfection (£10) and disposable usage (£80) avoided by traction removal was calculated at £90 per procedure.
CONCLUSION: No mortality occurred as a result of the traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Laparoscopy for suspected low profile button device misplacement was needed in one case (0.60%). Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes was generally safe and a cost-saving procedure in our experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033842     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-1090-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  12 in total

1.  Small bowel perforation after incomplete removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy catheter.

Authors:  A Lattuneddu; P Morgagni; G Benati; S Delvecchio; D Garcea
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Perforation of an ileostomy by a retained percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube bumper.

Authors:  T R Siegel; M Douglass
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Complications associated with endoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes in children.

Authors:  Greta M Palmer; Geoff P Frawley; Ralf G Heine; Mark R Oliver
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  Medical, surgical, and health outcomes of gastrostomy feeding.

Authors:  G M Craig; L J Carr; H Cass; R P Hastings; M Lawson; S Reilly; M Ryan; J Townsend; L Spitz
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.449

5.  Complications of removing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in children.

Authors:  G E Kobak; D T McClenathan; S J Schurman
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.839

6.  Nonendoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: morbidity and mortality in children.

Authors:  M Yaseen; M I Steele; J E Grunow
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Complications of retained internal bolster after pediatric percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  D L Mollitt; M L Dokler; J S Evans; S D Jeiven; D E George
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a safe technique with major symptom relief and high parental satisfaction.

Authors:  Tone Lise Avitsland; Charlotte Kristensen; Ragnhild Emblem; Marijke Veenstra; Tom Mala; Kristin Bjørnland
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Impact of gastrostomy tube feeding on the quality of life of carers of children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Peter B Sullivan; Edmund Juszczak; Allison M E Bachlet; Adrian G Thomas; Bridget Lambert; Angharad Vernon-Roberts; Hugh W Grant; Muftah Eltumi; Nicola Alder; Crispin Jenkinson
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.449

10.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique.

Authors:  M W Gauderer; J L Ponsky; R J Izant
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  3 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  Jye Hae Park; Seonkyeong Rhie; Su Jin Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2011-01-31

2.  Hidden treasure in an endoscopically retrieved oesophageal trichobezoar.

Authors:  Elizabeth Renji; Anand K Nathan; Mark A Dalzell
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-18

3.  Initial experience with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-fastener fixation in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Morten Kvello; Charlotte Kristensen Knatten; Gøri Perminow; Hans Skari; Anders Engebretsen; Ole Schistad; Ragnhild Emblem; Kristin Bjørnland
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.